Suppr超能文献

安非他命反应调节了负性情感与酒精使用之间的关系。

The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clinical Research Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Feb;37(2):348-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01935.x. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Considerable evidence suggests that sensitivity to the stimulant effects of alcohol and other drugs is a risk marker for heavy or problematic use of those substances. A separate body of research implicates negative emotionality. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the independent and interactive effects of the stimulant response, assessed with an amphetamine challenge, and negative emotionality on alcohol and drug use.

METHODS

Healthy young women and men completed the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) and an inventory assessing alcohol and other drug use. Subsequently, the effects of 10-mg d-amphetamine were determined in the laboratory using the Stimulant scale of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale. Hierarchical regression analyses evaluated the effects of amphetamine response and the MPQ factor Negative Emotionality on measures of substance use.

RESULTS

The amphetamine response moderated relationships between negative emotionality and alcohol use: in combination with a robust amphetamine response (i.e., enhanced stimulant effects as compared with baseline), negative emotionality predicted greater alcohol consumption, more episodes of binge drinking, and more frequent intoxication in regression models. A strong stimulant response independently predicted having used an illicit drug, and there was a trend for it to predict having used alcohol. Negative emotionality alone was not associated with any measure of alcohol or drug use.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the idea that emotion-based behavioral dysregulation promotes reward seeking, a high level of negative emotionality was associated with maladaptive alcohol use when it co-occurred with sensitivity to drug-based reward. The findings contribute to our understanding of how differences in personality may interact with those in drug response to affect alcohol use.

摘要

背景

大量证据表明,对酒精和其他药物的兴奋剂效应的敏感性是这些物质重度或问题性使用的风险标志物。另一部分研究表明,负性情绪也与此有关。本研究的目的是评估兴奋剂反应(通过安非他命挑战评估)和负性情绪对酒精和药物使用的独立和交互作用。

方法

健康的年轻女性和男性完成了多维人格问卷(MPQ)和酒精和其他药物使用评估问卷。随后,在实验室中使用双相酒精效应量表的兴奋剂量表评估了 10 毫克 d-安非他命的效果。分层回归分析评估了安非他命反应和 MPQ 因子负性情绪对物质使用测量的影响。

结果

安非他命反应调节了负性情绪和酒精使用之间的关系:在与强大的安非他命反应(即与基线相比增强的兴奋剂效应)相结合的情况下,负性情绪预测了更大的酒精摄入量、更多的狂欢饮酒发作和更频繁的醉酒。强烈的兴奋剂反应独立预测了非法药物的使用,并且有趋势表明它可以预测酒精的使用。负性情绪本身与任何酒精或药物使用的测量值均无关。

结论

与基于情绪的行为失调促进奖励寻求的观点一致,当高负性情绪与对药物奖励的敏感性同时发生时,与适应不良的酒精使用有关。这些发现有助于我们理解人格差异如何与药物反应差异相互作用,从而影响酒精使用。

相似文献

1
The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Feb;37(2):348-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01935.x. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
2
Personality and gender differences in effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;15(6):599-609. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.6.599.
3
Family history of alcoholism and response to amphetamine: sex differences in the effect of risk.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 May;29(5):773-80. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000164380.16043.4f.
4
Personality and the subjective effects of acute amphetamine in healthy volunteers.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 May;31(5):1064-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300939.
5
Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan;233(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4091-y. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
8
Inattention, impulsive action, and subjective response to D-amphetamine.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Nov 1;133(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.021. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
10
Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar;220(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2498-7. Epub 2011 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
A translational behavioral model of mood-based impulsivity: Implications for substance abuse.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Apr 1;122(1-2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
Relationship between personality change and the onset and course of alcohol dependence in young adulthood.
Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):540-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03617.x. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
3
Subjective response to alcohol challenge: a quantitative review.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct;35(10):1759-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01521.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
5
Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):389-99. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.26.
7
Amphetamine self-administration in light and moderate drinkers.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Mar;35(3):443-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01361.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
8
OPRM1 gene variants modulate amphetamine-induced euphoria in humans.
Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Mar;10(2):199-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00655.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
9
Disruptive symptoms in childhood and adolescence and early initiation of tobacco and cannabis use: the Gazel Youth study.
Eur Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;25(7):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
10
Dopaminergic network differences in human impulsivity.
Science. 2010 Jul 30;329(5991):532. doi: 10.1126/science.1185778.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验