• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一篇关于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脑卒中后失语症有效性的综述。

A review on the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-stroke aphasia.

机构信息

Neuropsychiatric Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Hong SAR, China.

出版信息

Rev Neurosci. 2013;24(1):105-14. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0072.

DOI:10.1515/revneuro-2012-0072
PMID:23241586
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This evidence-based review reports an updated evaluation and critical appraisal of available studies that investigated the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify studies that investigated the therapeutic effects of rTMS on post-stroke aphasia in various electronic databases, from their inception to 2011. The selected studies were classified according to the types of participants, types of interventions, outcome measures, and results. The methodological qualities of the selected studies were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.

RESULTS

The current review was based on 12 studies, including open-label designs and controlled trials, that showed a positive effect of rTMS, with or without conventional rehabilitation, on post-stroke aphasia compared with sham or conventional rehabilitation alone. About 41% of the selected studies reported the long-term effect of rTMS on aphasia recovery. No adverse effect was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The current review reveals that rTMS with or without conventional rehabilitation has positive effects on post-stroke aphasia. The studies also contributed to the plausible mechanisms of stroke recovery. However, with the concerns over the methodology of the selected studies in this review, a larger-scale, multicenter, well-designed randomized controlled trial involving different phases and types of aphasia needs to be carried out before recommending rTMS as a complementary treatment for post-stroke aphasia.

摘要

背景

本循证综述报告了对现有研究的最新评估和批判性评价,这些研究调查了重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在脑卒中后失语症康复中的有效性。

方法

从建库到 2011 年,我们在各种电子数据库中进行了文献检索,以确定研究 rTMS 对各种类型的脑卒中后失语症治疗效果的研究。根据参与者类型、干预类型、结果测量和结果对所选研究进行分类。使用物理治疗证据数据库量表评估所选研究的方法学质量。

结果

本综述基于 12 项研究,包括开放性设计和对照试验,这些研究表明 rTMS 联合或不联合常规康复治疗与假刺激或单纯常规康复治疗相比,对脑卒中后失语症有积极的影响。约 41%的入选研究报告了 rTMS 对失语症恢复的长期影响。未报告不良反应。

结论

本综述揭示 rTMS 联合或不联合常规康复治疗对脑卒中后失语症有积极的影响。这些研究也为中风恢复的可能机制提供了证据。然而,考虑到本综述中入选研究的方法学问题,需要开展更大规模、多中心、设计良好的随机对照试验,涉及不同阶段和类型的失语症,然后才能推荐 rTMS 作为脑卒中后失语症的补充治疗方法。

相似文献

1
A review on the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-stroke aphasia.一篇关于重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脑卒中后失语症有效性的综述。
Rev Neurosci. 2013;24(1):105-14. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0072.
2
Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia: a randomized, sham-controlled study.不同频率重复经颅磁刺激对非流畅性失语脑卒中患者的影响:一项随机、假刺激对照研究
Neurol Res. 2018 Jun;40(6):459-465. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1453980. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3
Long term language recovery subsequent to low frequency rTMS in chronic non-fluent aphasia.低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗慢性非流利性失语症后的长期语言恢复。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(4):915-28. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130915.
4
Excitatory deep transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over the right homologous Broca's region improves naming in chronic post-stroke aphasia.右同源布罗卡区 H 线圈的兴奋性深部经颅磁刺激改善慢性脑卒中后失语症的命名。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968313508471. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
5
Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Language Recovery in Poststroke Survivors With Aphasia: An Updated Meta-analysis.低频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后失语症患者语言康复的影响:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Aug;35(8):680-691. doi: 10.1177/15459683211011230. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Non-invasive brain stimulation (rTMS and tDCS) in patients with aphasia: mode of action at the cellular level.非侵入性脑刺激(rTMS 和 tDCS)在失语症患者中的应用:细胞水平的作用机制。
Brain Res Bull. 2013 Sep;98:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
Non-invasive repeated therapeutic stimulation for aphasia recovery: a multilingual, multicenter aphasia trial.非侵入性重复治疗刺激治疗失语症康复:多语言、多中心失语症试验。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Apr;24(4):751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑卒中后失语症患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Aug;35(8):1103-1116. doi: 10.1177/0269215521999554. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
9
A systematic review of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasia rehabilitation: Leads for future studies.重复经颅磁刺激治疗失语症康复的系统评价:对未来研究的启示。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Aug;127:212-241. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Evaluation of rTMS in patients with poststroke aphasia: a systematic review and focused meta-analysis.rTMS 治疗脑卒中后失语症的疗效评价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug;43(8):4685-4694. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06092-x. Epub 2022 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Treatment: A Review.经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激在原发性进行性失语症治疗中的疗效:一项综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):839. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080839.
2
Effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on aphasia in cerebrovascular accident patients: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脑血管意外患者失语症的有效性和安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(52):e18561. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018561.
3
Selective distant electrostimulation by synchronized bipolar nanosecond pulses.
选择性远距离双相纳秒脉冲同步电刺激。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 11;9(1):13116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49664-2.
4
The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the treatment of aphasia caused by cerebrovascular accident (CVA).低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑血管意外(CVA)所致失语症的治疗效果。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Mar 25;32:25. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.25. eCollection 2018.
5
The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the treatment of aphasia caused by cerebrovascular accident (CVA).低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑血管意外(CVA)所致失语症的治疗效果。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Dec 27;31:137. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.137. eCollection 2017.
6
Transcranial brain stimulation (TMS and tDCS) for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: Controversies.经颅脑刺激(重复经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激)用于中风后失语症康复:争议
Dement Neuropsychol. 2014 Jul-Sep;8(3):207-215. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642014DN83000003.
7
Study on Language Rehabilitation for Aphasia.失语症语言康复研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jun 20;130(12):1491-1497. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.207465.
8
Weighing the Cost and Benefit of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Different Reading Subskills.权衡经颅直流电刺激对不同阅读子技能的成本与效益
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jun 7;10:262. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00262. eCollection 2016.
9
Improvement of white matter and functional connectivity abnormalities by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in crossed aphasia in dextral.右利手交叉性失语症中重复经颅磁刺激对白质及功能连接异常的改善作用
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Oct 15;7(10):3659-68. eCollection 2014.
10
Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke.经颅脑刺激促进中风后的功能恢复。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2014 Feb;27(1):54-60. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000059.