Craig R J, Olson R E
Drug Abuse Program 123, West Side VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612.
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Mar;46(2):230-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199003)46:2<230::aid-jclp2270460217>3.0.co;2-7.
Cocaine addicts (N = 107) and opiate addicts (N = 86) in treatment for drug abuse were compared on the MCMI. Univariate analyses revealed that cocaine abusers showed more traits of the antisocial personality style, whereas heroin addicts evinced more problems with anxiety and somatic distress, probably related to residual problems of withdrawal, and alcohol abuse. Multivariate analyses revealed four distinct clusters (MCMI patterns 456', 865', 56', and 8') that aligned by underlying personality style and clinical syndrome expression rather than by drug of choice. Ideographic analyses further demonstrated consistencies in prevalence rates of DSM-III-R personality disorders. Results do not support the pharmacodynamic theory of drug abuse. It was concluded that the similarities in personality between these two groups are greater than their differences.
对107名接受药物滥用治疗的可卡因成瘾者和86名阿片类成瘾者进行了明尼苏达多项个性调查表(MCMI)测试。单因素分析显示,可卡因滥用者表现出更多反社会人格类型的特征,而海洛因成瘾者则表现出更多焦虑和躯体不适问题,这可能与戒断残留问题及酒精滥用有关。多因素分析揭示了四个不同的聚类(MCMI模式456'、865'、56'和8'),这些聚类是根据潜在的人格类型和临床综合征表现而非所选择的药物来划分的。个体分析进一步证明了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中人格障碍患病率的一致性。结果不支持药物滥用的药效学理论。研究得出结论,这两组人群在人格方面的相似性大于差异性。