• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study.社会和技术干扰对行人过道路行为的影响:一项观察性研究。
Inj Prev. 2013 Aug;19(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
2
Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street.分心与行人安全:使用手机通话、收发短信和听音乐如何影响过马路行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45(2):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
3
Investigation of traffic and safety behavior of pedestrians while texting or web-surfing.行人边发短信或上网边出行的交通和安全行为研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(6):389-394. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1770741. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians' crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study.手机分心对行人在有信号交叉口的穿行行为和视觉注意分配的影响:一项户外实验研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted.行人自我报告的智能手机使用情况:积极态度和高暴露度会影响分心时过马路的意图。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
6
Validity across four common street-crossing distraction indicators to predict pedestrian safety.四种常见过街分心指标对预测行人安全的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17756-y.
7
The incidence of pedestrian distraction at urban intersections after implementation of a Streets Smarts campaign.实施“街道智慧”活动后城市交叉路口行人注意力分散的发生率。
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0050-7. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
Heads Up, Phones Down: A Pedestrian Safety Intervention on Distracted Crosswalk Behavior.抬头,手机放低:减少行人分心过路口行为的干预措施。
J Community Health. 2018 Aug;43(4):810-815. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0488-y.
9
The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections.使用手机对在有信号灯和无信号灯十字路口行人过街行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
10
Distracted Pedestrian Behavior on two Urban College Campuses.行人在两个城市大学校园里的分心行为。
J Community Health. 2018 Feb;43(1):96-102. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0392-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A study exploring predictors of cell phone use while walking among adolescents based on theory of planned behavior.一项基于计划行为理论探索青少年步行时使用手机的预测因素的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):2894. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24047-7.
2
Implementation and Testing of V2I Communication Strategies for Emergency Vehicle Priority and Pedestrian Safety in Urban Environments.城市环境中用于应急车辆优先通行和行人安全的车对基础设施通信策略的实施与测试
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;25(2):485. doi: 10.3390/s25020485.
3
Validity across four common street-crossing distraction indicators to predict pedestrian safety.四种常见过街分心指标对预测行人安全的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17756-y.
4
Altered gait parameters in distracted walking: a bio-evolutionary and prognostic health perspective on passive listening and active responding during cell phone use.分心行走时步态参数的改变:从生物进化和健康预后角度看手机使用过程中的被动聆听与主动回应
Front Integr Neurosci. 2023 Nov 10;17:1135495. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1135495. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of mobile phone use on accidental falls risk in young adult pedestrians.手机使用对年轻成年行人意外跌倒风险的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 7;9(8):e18366. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18366. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Someone to Watch Over You: Using Bluetooth Beacons for Alerting Distracted Pedestrians.守护你的人:使用蓝牙信标提醒分心的行人。
IEEE Internet Things J. 2022 Nov;9(22):23017-23030. doi: 10.1109/jiot.2022.3187965. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
7
What's that on Your Phone? Effects of Mobile Device Task Type on Pedestrian Performance.你手机上是什么?移动设备任务类型对行人表现的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1068-1080. doi: 10.1177/00187208221141175. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
Anger and worry are related to problematic smartphone use: A cross-sectional examination of novel psychopathological constructs in a college-aged sample in the United Arab Emirates.愤怒和担忧与智能手机使用问题有关:对阿联酋大学生样本中新型心理病理结构的横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 2;8(10):e10917. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10917. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Stress can lead to an increase in smartphone use in the context of texting while walking.压力会导致在走路时发短信的情况下智能手机使用量增加。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:760107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760107. eCollection 2022.
10
Factors Influencing Pedestrian Smartphone Use and Effect of Combined Visual and Auditory Intervention on "Smombies": A Chinese Observational Study.影响行人使用智能手机的因素及视听联合干预对“低头族”的影响:一项中国观察性研究。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;67:1604601. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604601. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Distraction-induced driving error: an on-road examination of the errors made by distracted and undistracted drivers.分散驾驶引起的驾驶错误:分心和不分心驾驶员犯错的道路检测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
2
Scrolling and driving: how an MP3 player and its aftermarket controller affect driving performance and visual behavior.滚动和驾驶:MP3 播放器及其售后控制器如何影响驾驶性能和视觉行为。
Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):250-63. doi: 10.1177/0018720811429562.
3
Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street.分心与行人安全:使用手机通话、收发短信和听音乐如何影响过马路行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45(2):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
4
Distracted driving among adolescents: challenges and opportunities.青少年分心驾驶:挑战与机遇
Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;17(4):285. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040096. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
5
Pedestrian injury and human behaviour: observing road-rule violations at high-incident intersections.行人伤害与人类行为:在高事故交叉口观察违反交通规则行为。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021063. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Gender differences in pedestrian rule compliance and visual search at signalized and unsignalized crossroads.行人和非行人环境下,性别差异对遵守交通规则和信号交叉口视觉搜索的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Sep;43(5):1794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
7
Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians.分心行走:手机增加大学生行人受伤风险。
J Safety Res. 2011 Apr;42(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
8
Phoning while driving II: a review of driving conditions influence.驾车时打电话 II:驾驶条件影响综述。
Ergonomics. 2010 May;53(5):602-16. doi: 10.1080/00140131003769092.
9
Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies.驾车时打电话:对流行病学、心理学、行为学和生理学研究的综述。
Ergonomics. 2010 May;53(5):589-601. doi: 10.1080/00140131003672023.
10
Text messaging during simulated driving.文本信息在模拟驾驶中的使用。
Hum Factors. 2009 Oct;51(5):762-70. doi: 10.1177/0018720809353319.

社会和技术干扰对行人过道路行为的影响:一项观察性研究。

Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study.

机构信息

Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104-2499, USA.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2013 Aug;19(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601
PMID:23243104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3717764/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians.

METHODS

Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site.

RESULTS

Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians.

CONCLUSIONS

Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨技术和社会干扰对行人谨慎行为和穿越时间的影响。

方法

2012 年,在 20 个高风险交叉口的 3 个随机分配的时间窗口中的 1 个时间窗口中观察行人。观察者记录了人口统计学和行为信息,包括使用移动设备(打电话、发短信或听音乐)。我们在调整年龄和性别后,检查了分心和穿越行为之间的关联。所有多元分析均采用随机效应逻辑回归(二项结果)和随机效应线性回归(连续结果)进行,考虑到站点聚类。

结果

观察者记录了 1102 名行人的穿越行为。近三分之一(29.8%)的行人在穿越时进行了分散注意力的活动。分心活动包括听音乐(11.2%)、发短信(7.3%)和使用手持电话(6.2%)。发短信、使用手机和与同伴交谈会增加穿越时间。与未分心的行人相比,发短信的行人穿过平均交叉口(3.4 条车道)需要额外的 1.87 秒(18.0%)。发短信的行人比未分心的行人至少表现出 1 种不安全的穿越行为(闯红灯、在交叉口中间穿越或不看两侧)的可能性高出 3.9 倍。与未分心的行人相比,听音乐的行人在穿过平均交叉口时快了半秒多(0.54 秒)。

结论

即使在穿过路口时,行人的分心行为也很常见。技术和社会干扰会增加穿越时间,其中发短信的风险最高。我们的研究结果表明,需要进行干预研究以降低行人受伤的风险。