Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104-2499, USA.
Inj Prev. 2013 Aug;19(4):232-7. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
The objective of the present work was to study the impact of technological and social distraction on cautionary behaviours and crossing times in pedestrians.
Pedestrians were observed at 20 high-risk intersections during 1 of 3 randomly assigned time windows in 2012. Observers recorded demographic and behavioural information, including use of a mobile device (talking on the phone, text messaging, or listening to music). We examined the association between distraction and crossing behaviours, adjusting for age and gender. All multivariate analyses were conducted with random effect logistic regression (binary outcomes) and random effect linear regression (continuous outcomes), accounting for clustering by site.
Observers recorded crossing behaviours for 1102 pedestrians. Nearly one-third (29.8%) of all pedestrians performed a distracting activity while crossing. Distractions included listening to music (11.2%), text messaging (7.3%) and using a handheld phone (6.2%). Text messaging, mobile phone use and talking with a companion increased crossing time. Texting pedestrians took 1.87 additional seconds (18.0%) to cross the average intersection (3.4 lanes), compared to undistracted pedestrians. Texting pedestrians were 3.9 times more likely than undistracted pedestrians to display at least 1 unsafe crossing behaviour (disobeying the lights, crossing mid-intersection, or failing to look both ways). Pedestrians listening to music walked more than half a second (0.54) faster across the average intersection than undistracted pedestrians.
Distracting activity is common among pedestrians, even while crossing intersections. Technological and social distractions increase crossing times, with text messaging associated with the highest risk. Our findings suggest the need for intervention studies to reduce risk of pedestrian injury.
本研究旨在探讨技术和社会干扰对行人谨慎行为和穿越时间的影响。
2012 年,在 20 个高风险交叉口的 3 个随机分配的时间窗口中的 1 个时间窗口中观察行人。观察者记录了人口统计学和行为信息,包括使用移动设备(打电话、发短信或听音乐)。我们在调整年龄和性别后,检查了分心和穿越行为之间的关联。所有多元分析均采用随机效应逻辑回归(二项结果)和随机效应线性回归(连续结果)进行,考虑到站点聚类。
观察者记录了 1102 名行人的穿越行为。近三分之一(29.8%)的行人在穿越时进行了分散注意力的活动。分心活动包括听音乐(11.2%)、发短信(7.3%)和使用手持电话(6.2%)。发短信、使用手机和与同伴交谈会增加穿越时间。与未分心的行人相比,发短信的行人穿过平均交叉口(3.4 条车道)需要额外的 1.87 秒(18.0%)。发短信的行人比未分心的行人至少表现出 1 种不安全的穿越行为(闯红灯、在交叉口中间穿越或不看两侧)的可能性高出 3.9 倍。与未分心的行人相比,听音乐的行人在穿过平均交叉口时快了半秒多(0.54 秒)。
即使在穿过路口时,行人的分心行为也很常见。技术和社会干扰会增加穿越时间,其中发短信的风险最高。我们的研究结果表明,需要进行干预研究以降低行人受伤的风险。