• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分心行走:手机增加大学生行人受伤风险。

Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham Injury Control Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294–2041, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2011 Apr;42(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2011.01.004
PMID:21569892
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Distraction on cell phones jeopardizes motor-vehicle driver safety, but few studies examine distracted walking. At particular risk are college students, who walk frequently in and near traffic, have increased pedestrian injury rates compared to other age groups, and frequently use cell phones.

METHOD

Using an interactive and immersive virtual environment, two experiments studied the effect of cell phone conversation on distraction of college student pedestrians. In the first, we examined whether pedestrians would display riskier behavior when distracted by a naturalistic cell phone conversation than when undistracted. We also considered whether individual difference factors would moderate the effect of the distraction. In a second experiment, we examined the impact of three forms of distraction on pedestrian safety: (a) engaging in a cell phone conversation, (b) engaging in a cognitively challenging spatial task by phone, and (c) engaging in a cognitively challenging mental arithmetic task by phone.

RESULTS

Results revealed that cell phone conversations distracted college pedestrians considerably across all pedestrian safety variables measured, with just one exception. Attention to traffic was not affected by the naturalistic phone conversation in Experiment 1, but was altered by the cognitively-demanding content of some types of conversation in Experiment 2. The content of the conversation did not play a major role in distraction across other variables; both mundane and cognitively complex conversations distracted participants. Moreover, no significant associations between individual difference factors and susceptibility to distraction emerged.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

Results may inform researchers, policy makers, and pedestrians themselves. Educational campaigns might discourage telephone conversations in pedestrian environments.

摘要

简介

手机分心会危及机动车驾驶员的安全,但很少有研究关注分心行走。特别是大学生面临风险,他们经常在交通繁忙的地方行走,与其他年龄段相比,行人受伤率更高,而且经常使用手机。

方法

本研究使用互动式沉浸式虚拟环境,通过两项实验研究了手机对话对大学生行人分心的影响。在第一项实验中,我们研究了当行人被自然对话分心时,是否会比不被分心时表现出更危险的行为。我们还考虑了个体差异因素是否会调节分心的影响。在第二项实验中,我们研究了三种形式的分心对行人安全的影响:(a)进行手机对话,(b)通过电话进行认知挑战性空间任务,以及(c)通过电话进行认知挑战性心算任务。

结果

结果表明,手机对话会极大地分散大学生行人的注意力,除了一个例外。在实验 1 中,自然对话不会影响对交通的注意力,但在实验 2 中,一些类型的认知要求高的对话内容会改变注意力。对话的内容在其他变量的分心方面没有起到主要作用;无论是平凡的还是认知复杂的对话都会分散参与者的注意力。此外,个体差异因素与易受干扰之间没有显著关联。

对行业的影响

研究结果可能为研究人员、政策制定者和行人自己提供信息。教育活动可能会劝阻行人环境中的电话交谈。

相似文献

1
Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians.分心行走:手机增加大学生行人受伤风险。
J Safety Res. 2011 Apr;42(2):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
2
Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk.手机分心对儿童行人受伤风险的影响。
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e179-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1382.
3
Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places.行人在公共场所因使用手机而受伤。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Aug;57:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
4
Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety.移动电话、注意力分散与行人安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.005. Epub 2007 May 21.
5
The impact of in-vehicle cell-phone use on accidents or near-accidents among college students.车内使用手机对大学生交通事故或险些发生交通事故的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2004 Nov-Dec;53(3):101-7. doi: 10.3200/JACH.53.3.101-108.
6
Cell phones change the way we walk.手机改变了我们的行走方式。
Gait Posture. 2012 Apr;35(4):688-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
Relative injury severity among vulnerable non-motorised road users: comparative analysis of injury arising from bicycle-motor vehicle and bicycle-pedestrian collisions.弱势非机动道路使用者的相对伤害严重程度:自行车-机动车和自行车-行人碰撞所致伤害的比较分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
8
The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections.使用手机对在有信号灯和无信号灯十字路口行人过街行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
9
A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model.关于混合 Logit 模型在机动车事故中行人伤害严重程度建模的说明。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
10
Urban and rural variation in walking patterns and pedestrian crashes.步行模式与行人碰撞事故中的城乡差异。
Inj Prev. 2008 Dec;14(6):377-80. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.018234.

引用本文的文献

1
Center-of-Gravity-Aware Graph Convolution for Unsafe Behavior Recognition of Construction Workers.用于建筑工人不安全行为识别的重心感知图卷积
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Sep 4;25(17):5493. doi: 10.3390/s25175493.
2
A study exploring predictors of cell phone use while walking among adolescents based on theory of planned behavior.一项基于计划行为理论探索青少年步行时使用手机的预测因素的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 22;25(1):2894. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24047-7.
3
Effects of Motor Task Difficulty on Postural Control Complexity during Dual Tasks in Young Adults: A Nonlinear Approach.
运动任务难度对年轻人双重任务中姿势控制复杂性的影响:一种非线性方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;23(2):628. doi: 10.3390/s23020628.
4
Someone to Watch Over You: Using Bluetooth Beacons for Alerting Distracted Pedestrians.守护你的人:使用蓝牙信标提醒分心的行人。
IEEE Internet Things J. 2022 Nov;9(22):23017-23030. doi: 10.1109/jiot.2022.3187965. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
Factors Influencing Pedestrian Smartphone Use and Effect of Combined Visual and Auditory Intervention on "Smombies": A Chinese Observational Study.影响行人使用智能手机的因素及视听联合干预对“低头族”的影响:一项中国观察性研究。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;67:1604601. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604601. eCollection 2022.
6
Mobile Phone Use during Gait: The Role of Perceived Prioritization and Executive Control.手机使用与步态:感知优先级和执行控制的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 16;18(16):8637. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168637.
7
How Narcissism Shapes Responses to Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior: Hypo-Responsiveness or Hyper-Responsiveness?自恋如何影响对反社会和亲社会行为的反应:低反应还是高反应?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Mar;48(3):363-381. doi: 10.1177/01461672211007293. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Distracted mobile device use among street-crossing college student pedestrians: an observational approach.大学生过街道时分散注意力使用移动设备的观察性研究
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Oct;70(7):2135-2142. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1845182. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
The unknown denominator problem in population studies of disease frequency.疾病频率人群研究中的未知分母问题。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;35:100361. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100361. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
10
Ridesharing and motor vehicle crashes: a spatial ecological case-crossover study of trip-level data.拼车与机动车事故:基于出行水平数据的空间生态学病例交叉研究
Inj Prev. 2021 Apr;27(2):118-123. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043644. Epub 2020 Apr 6.