Department of Family Medicine, for Stanley Herring Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941.
PURPOSE OF THE STATEMENT: ▸ To provide an evidence-based, best practises summary to assist physicians with the evaluation and management of sports concussion. ▸ To establish the level of evidence, knowledge gaps and areas requiring additional research.
▸ Sports medicine physicians are frequently involved in the care of patients with sports concussion. ▸ Sports medicine physicians are specifically trained to provide care along the continuum of sports concussion from the acute injury to return-to-play (RTP) decisions. ▸ The care of athletes with sports concussion is ideally performed by healthcare professionals with specific training and experience in the assessment and management of concussion. Competence should be determined by training and experience, not dictated by specialty. ▸ While this statement is directed towards sports medicine physicians, it may also assist other physicians and healthcare professionals in the care of patients with sports concussion.
▸ Concussion is defined as a traumatically induced transient disturbance of brain function and involves a complex pathophysiological process. Concussion is a subset of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) which is generally self-limited and at the less-severe end of the brain injury spectrum.
▸ Animal and human studies support the concept of postconcussive vulnerability, showing that a second blow before the brain has recovered results in worsening metabolic changes within the cell. ▸ Experimental evidence suggests the concussed brain is less responsive to usual neural activation and when premature cognitive or physical activity occurs before complete recovery the brain may be vulnerable to prolonged dysfunction.
▸ It is estimated that as many as 3.8 million concussions occur in the USA per year during competitive sports and recreational activities; however, as many as 50% of the concussions may go unreported. ▸ Concussions occur in all sports with the highest incidence in football, hockey, rugby, soccer and basketball. RISK FACTORS FOR SPORT-RELATED CONCUSSION: ▸ A history of concussion is associated with a higher risk of sustaining another concussion. ▸ A greater number, severity and duration of symptoms after a concussion are predictors of a prolonged recovery. ▸ In sports with similar playing rules, the reported incidence of concussion is higher in female athletes than in male athletes. ▸ Certain sports, positions and individual playing styles have a greater risk of concussion. ▸ Youth athletes may have a more prolonged recovery and are more susceptible to a concussion accompanied by a catastrophic injury. ▸ Preinjury mood disorders, learning disorders, attention-deficit disorders (ADD/ADHD) and migraine headaches complicate diagnosis and management of a concussion.
▸ Concussion remains a clinical diagnosis ideally made by a healthcare provider familiar with the athlete and knowledgeable in the recognition and evaluation of concussion. ▸ Graded symptom checklists provide an objective tool for assessing a variety of symptoms related to concussions, while also tracking the severity of those symptoms over serial evaluations. ▸ Standardised assessment tools provide a helpful structure for the evaluation of concussion, although limited validation of these assessment tools is available.
▸ Any athlete suspected of having a concussion should be stopped from playing and assessed by a licenced healthcare provider trained in the evaluation and management of concussions. ▸ Recognition and initial assessment of a concussion should be guided by a symptoms checklist, cognitive evaluation (including orientation, past and immediate memory, new learning and concentration), balance tests and further neurological physical examination. ▸ While standardised sideline tests are a useful framework for examination, the sensitivity, specificity, validity and reliability of these tests among different age groups, cultural groups and settings is largely undefined. Their practical usefulness with or without an individual baseline test is also largely unknown. ▸ Balance disturbance is a specific indicator of a concussion, but not very sensitive. Balance testing on the sideline may be substantially different than baseline tests because of differences in shoe/cleat-type or surface, use of ankle tape or braces, or the presence of other lower extremity injury. ▸ Imaging is reserved for athletes where intracerebral bleeding is suspected. ▸ There is no same day RTP for an athlete diagnosed with a concussion. ▸ Athletes suspected or diagnosed with a concussion should be monitored for deteriorating physical or mental status.
▸ Neuropsychological (NP) tests are an objective measure of brain-behaviour relationships and are more sensitive for subtle cognitive impairment than clinical exam. ▸ Most concussions can be managed appropriately without the use of NP testing. ▸ Computerised neuropsychological (CNP) testing should be interpreted by healthcare professionals trained and familiar with the type of test and the individual test limitations, including a knowledgeable assessment of the reliable change index, baseline variability and false-positive and false-negative rates. ▸ Paper and pencil NP tests can be more comprehensive, test different domains and assess for other conditions which may masquerade as or complicate assessment of concussion. ▸ NP testing should be used only as part of a comprehensive concussion management strategy and should not be used in isolation. ▸ The ideal timing, frequency and type of NP testing have not been determined. ▸ In some cases, properly administered and interpreted NP testing provides an added value to assess cognitive function and recovery in the management of sports concussions. ▸ It is unknown if use of NP testing in the management of sports concussion helps prevent recurrent concussion, catastrophic injury or long-term complications. ▸ Comprehensive NP evaluation is helpful in the post-concussion management of athletes with persistent symptoms or complicated courses.
▸ Students will require cognitive rest and may require academic accommodations such as reduced workload and extended time for tests while recovering from a concussion.
▸ Concussion symptoms should be resolved before returning to exercise. ▸ A RTP progression involves a gradual, step-wise increase in physical demands, sports-specific activities and the risk for contact. ▸ If symptoms occur with activity, the progression should be halted and restarted at the preceding symptom-free step. ▸ RTP after concussion should occur only with medical clearance from a licenced healthcare provider trained in the evaluation and management of concussions. SHORT-TERM RISKS OF PREMATURE RTP: ▸ The primary concern with early RTP is decreased reaction time leading to an increased risk of a repeat concussion or other injury and prolongation of symptoms. LONG-TERM EFFECTS: ▸ There is an increasing concern that head impact exposure and recurrent concussions contribute to long-term neurological sequelae. ▸ Some studies have suggested an association between prior concussions and chronic cognitive dysfunction. Large-scale epidemiological studies are needed to more clearly define risk factors and causation of any long-term neurological impairment.
▸ There are no evidence-based guidelines for disqualifying/retiring an athlete from a sport after a concussion. Each case should be carefully deliberated and an individualised approach to determining disqualification taken.
▸ Greater efforts are needed to educate involved parties, including athletes, parents, coaches, officials, school administrators and healthcare providers to improve concussion recognition, management and prevention. ▸ Physicians should be prepared to provide counselling regarding potential long-term consequences of a concussion and recurrent concussions.
▸ Primary prevention of some injuries may be possible with modification and enforcement of the rules and fair play. ▸ Helmets, both hard (football, lacrosse and hockey) and soft (soccer, rugby) are best suited to prevent impact injuries (fracture, bleeding, laceration, etc.) but have not been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of concussions. ▸ There is no current evidence that mouth guards can reduce the severity of or prevent concussions. ▸ Secondary prevention may be possible by appropriate RTP management.
▸ Legislative efforts provide a uniform standard for scholastic and non-scholastic sports organisations regarding concussion safety and management.
▸ Additional research is needed to validate current assessment tools, delineate the role of NP testing and improve identification of those at risk of prolonged post-concussive symptoms or other long-term complications. ▸ Evolving technologies for the diagnosis of concussion, such as newer neuroimaging techniques or biological markers, may provide new insights into the evaluation and management of sports concussion.
提供循证、最佳实践总结,以协助医生评估和管理运动性脑震荡。确定证据水平、知识空白和需要进一步研究的领域。
运动医学医师经常参与运动性脑震荡患者的治疗。运动医学医师专门接受过从急性损伤到重返运动(RTP)决策的运动性脑震荡连续护理的培训。运动性脑震荡的护理最好由具有评估和管理脑震荡经验和专门培训的医疗保健专业人员进行。能力应通过培训和经验确定,而不是由专业决定。虽然本声明针对运动医学医师,但它也可能有助于其他医师和医疗保健专业人员护理运动性脑震荡患者。
脑震荡定义为创伤性脑功能短暂障碍,涉及复杂的病理生理过程。脑震荡是轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)的一个子集,通常是自限性的,处于脑损伤谱的较轻端。
动物和人类研究支持脑震荡后易损性的概念,表明在大脑尚未恢复的情况下,第二次打击会导致细胞内代谢变化恶化。实验证据表明,脑震荡后的大脑对通常的神经激活反应较差,并且在认知或体力活动过早发生之前,如果大脑没有完全恢复,大脑可能容易受到长期功能障碍的影响。
据估计,美国每年在竞技运动和娱乐活动中有 380 万例脑震荡,但多达 50%的脑震荡可能未被报告。脑震荡发生在所有运动中,足球、曲棍球、橄榄球、足球和篮球的发生率最高。
脑震荡史与再次发生脑震荡的风险增加有关。脑震荡后症状的次数、严重程度和持续时间更长是恢复时间延长的预测因素。在具有相似比赛规则的运动中,女性运动员比男性运动员报告的脑震荡发生率更高。某些运动、位置和个人运动方式的脑震荡风险更高。青年运动员可能恢复时间更长,并且更容易发生伴有灾难性损伤的脑震荡。脑震荡前的情绪障碍、学习障碍、注意力缺陷障碍(ADD/ADHD)和偏头痛使脑震荡的诊断和管理复杂化。
脑震荡仍然是一种临床诊断,最好由熟悉运动员且对脑震荡的识别和评估有知识的医疗保健提供者做出。分级症状检查表为评估与脑震荡相关的各种症状提供了一种客观工具,同时还跟踪了这些症状在连续评估中的严重程度。标准化评估工具为脑震荡评估提供了一个有用的结构,但这些评估工具的验证有限。
sidelines 评估和管理:任何疑似脑震荡的运动员都应停止比赛并由接受过脑震荡评估和管理培训的有执照的医疗保健提供者进行评估。脑震荡的识别和初步评估应通过症状检查表、认知评估(包括定向、近期记忆、新学习和注意力)、平衡测试和进一步的神经体检进行指导。虽然标准的 sidelines 测试是检查的有用框架,但不同年龄组、文化组和环境中这些测试的敏感性、特异性、有效性和可靠性在很大程度上尚不清楚。它们在没有个人基线测试的情况下的实际有用性也在很大程度上未知。平衡障碍是脑震荡的一个特定指标,但不是很敏感。由于鞋子/鞋底类型或表面、使用踝带或支具、或存在其他下肢损伤, sidelines上的平衡测试可能与基线测试有很大不同。影像学检查仅用于怀疑颅内出血的运动员。被诊断患有脑震荡的运动员当天不允许重返赛场。疑似或诊断为脑震荡的运动员应监测其身体或精神状态的恶化。
神经心理学(NP)测试是大脑行为关系的客观测量,比临床检查更能敏感地检测出轻微的认知障碍。大多数脑震荡可以在没有使用 NP 测试的情况下进行适当的管理。计算机化神经心理学(CNP)测试应由接受过培训和熟悉测试类型以及个体测试局限性的医疗保健专业人员进行解释,包括对可靠变化指数、基线变异性以及假阳性和假阴性率的有知识评估。纸质和笔式 NP 测试可以更全面,测试不同的领域,并评估可能伪装为或使脑震荡评估复杂化的其他疾病。NP 测试仅应作为综合脑震荡管理策略的一部分使用,不应单独使用。何时、何时以及何种类型的 NP 测试尚未确定。在某些情况下,适当管理和解释的 NP 测试可以为评估运动性脑震荡的认知功能和恢复提供附加价值。目前尚不清楚使用运动性脑震荡管理中的 NP 测试是否有助于预防反复脑震荡、灾难性损伤或长期并发症。全面的 NP 评估有助于管理持续性症状或病情复杂的运动员。
学生需要认知休息,可能需要学术适应,例如减少工作量和延长测试时间,以在脑震荡后恢复。
脑震荡症状应在恢复运动前得到缓解。重返赛场的 RTP 涉及逐渐、逐步增加体力活动、专项活动和接触的风险。如果在活动中出现症状,应停止进展并在症状无进展的前一个步骤重新开始。脑震荡后 RTP 只能在接受过脑震荡评估和管理培训的有执照的医疗保健提供者的医疗许可下进行。过早重返赛场的短期风险:早期 RTP 的主要问题是反应时间缩短,导致再次脑震荡或其他损伤的风险增加,以及症状延长。长期影响:人们越来越担心头部撞击暴露和反复脑震荡会导致长期的神经后遗症。一些研究表明,先前的脑震荡与慢性认知功能障碍之间存在关联。需要进行大规模的流行病学研究,以更清楚地定义任何长期神经损伤的风险因素和病因。
没有基于证据的指导方针来取消/退休一名运动员的运动资格,因为每一个案例都需要仔细考虑,并采取个别方法来确定取消运动资格。
需要加大力度教育相关方,包括运动员、家长、教练、裁判、学校管理人员和医疗保健提供者,以提高对脑震荡的认识、管理和预防。医生应准备好就脑震荡的潜在长期后果和反复脑震荡提供咨询。
一些损伤的一级预防可能通过修改和执行规则和公平竞争来实现。头盔,无论是硬(足球、曲棍球和冰球)还是软(足球、橄榄球和足球),最适合防止冲击损伤(骨折、出血、撕裂、等),但尚未证明能降低脑震荡的严重程度和发生率。目前尚无证据表明口腔保护器可以减轻脑震荡的严重程度或预防脑震荡。二级预防可能通过适当的 RTP 管理来实现。
立法为学校和非学校体育组织提供了一个统一的标准,用于脑震荡安全和管理。
需要进一步研究来验证当前的评估工具,描述神经心理学测试的作用,并改善对长期脑震荡后症状或其他长期并发症风险的识别。不断发展的脑震荡诊断技术,如新型神经影像学技术或生物标志物,可能为脑震荡的评估和管理提供新的见解。