Marcus M
International Center for Dental Health Policy, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles.
J Dent Educ. 1990 Apr;54(4):224-7.
I have dealt with three questions concerning trends in quality assurance. In summary, we must ask ourselves whether the profession can develop methods for dealing effectively with dentists whose performance is found to be continually unsatisfactory. This may be achieved by making available effective tools for others to use in developing quality assurance systems. These tools will involve criteria and standards for services, appropriateness of treatment, measuring outcomes of care, and methods for assessing dental practices. This may involve working closely with consumer representatives to assist in gaining the consumer's point of view and incorporating it into the technology of quality assurance. Berwick, in a recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine, called for the application of a "Theory of Continuous Improvement" rather than the "Theory of Bad Apples." His view is that we should examine the process itself and try to improve it rather than look for outliers or bad apples. His point of view is consistent with the concept of quality assurance I have been talking about. Quality assurance systems should assure quality by proper assessment, identifying strengths and weaknesses in the provision of care. The strengths should be reinforced and the weaknesses should be rectified. This necessitates positive communication between those who perform quality assurance and those who are being evaluated. It also assumes that the technology is appropriate, recommendations are reasonable and that, when changes are made, quality will improve. In order to make the theory of continuous improvement work, it should be consistent with financial incentives and professional values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我已经处理了有关质量保证趋势的三个问题。总而言之,我们必须扪心自问,这个行业能否开发出有效应对那些表现持续不尽人意的牙医的方法。这可以通过提供有效的工具来实现,以便其他人在开发质量保证体系时使用。这些工具将涉及服务的标准和规范、治疗的适当性、护理结果的衡量以及评估牙科诊疗的方法。这可能需要与消费者代表密切合作,以帮助了解消费者的观点并将其纳入质量保证技术中。贝里克在最近发表于《新英格兰医学杂志》的一篇文章中,呼吁应用“持续改进理论”而非“坏苹果理论”。他认为我们应该审视过程本身并努力改进它,而不是寻找异常值或“坏苹果”。他的观点与我一直在谈论的质量保证概念一致。质量保证体系应通过适当的评估来确保质量,识别护理提供中的优势和劣势。优势应得到强化,劣势应得到纠正。这需要进行质量保证的人员与被评估人员之间进行积极的沟通。这也假定技术是合适的,建议是合理的,并且当做出改变时,质量将会提高。为了使持续改进理论发挥作用,它应该与财务激励措施和专业价值观相一致。(摘要截选至250词)