• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扶贫实验对低收入儿童校外结构化时间的影响的发展变化。

Developmental changes in impacts of an antipoverty experiment on low-income children's structured out-of-school time.

机构信息

Decision Information Resources, Houston, Texas 77098, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2013 Sep;49(9):1763-74. doi: 10.1037/a0030978. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1037/a0030978
PMID:23244402
Abstract

The experiment reported here tested impacts of New Hope, an employment-based poverty intervention for adults on developmental patterns of children's participation in structured out-of-school activities, using a cross-sequential design spanning ages 6 through 19. New Hope increased participation in activities (lessons, sports, religious, clubs, community centers, service). Its effects did not vary significantly across age, time of measurement, or gender, lasting well beyond parents' eligibility for program benefits. Overall participation peaked in early adolescence, declining thereafter. Policies that enhance participation during middle childhood may have long-term benefits because structured activities can provide opportunities for skill development and adult supervision that may be especially useful for children from low-income families.

摘要

本研究采用跨序列设计,对一项基于就业的成人减贫干预措施“新希望”进行测试,以检验其对儿童参与校外结构化活动发展模式的影响,研究对象年龄跨度为 6 岁至 19 岁。新希望增加了活动(课程、运动、宗教、俱乐部、社区中心、服务)的参与度。其效果在年龄、测量时间或性别方面没有显著差异,并且持续时间远远超过了父母获得项目福利的资格期限。总体参与度在青少年早期达到峰值,此后逐渐下降。在儿童中期增强参与度的政策可能会产生长期效益,因为结构化活动可以提供技能发展和成人监督的机会,这对于来自低收入家庭的儿童可能特别有用。

相似文献

1
Developmental changes in impacts of an antipoverty experiment on low-income children's structured out-of-school time.扶贫实验对低收入儿童校外结构化时间的影响的发展变化。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Sep;49(9):1763-74. doi: 10.1037/a0030978. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
2
The effects of antipoverty programs on children's cumulative level of poverty-related risk.反贫困项目对儿童与贫困相关风险累积水平的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):981-99. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.981.
3
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
4
Impacts on children of a policy to promote employment and reduce poverty for low-income parents: new hope after 5 years.一项促进低收入父母就业和减贫政策对儿童的影响:5年后的新希望
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):902-18. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.902.
5
Child well-being in an era of welfare reform: the sensitivity of transitions in development to policy change.福利改革时代的儿童福祉:发展转变对政策变化的敏感性。
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):919-32. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.919.
6
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
7
The Brookline Early Education Project: a 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention.布鲁克莱恩早期教育项目:一项以家庭为中心的早期健康与发展干预措施的25年随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):144-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2515.
8
Children from low-income families have less access to sports facilities, but are no less physically active: cross-sectional study (EarlyBird 35).横断面研究(EarlyBird 35)表明,低收入家庭的儿童使用体育设施的机会较少,但他们的身体活动水平并不低。
Child Care Health Dev. 2008 Jul;34(4):470-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00827.x. Epub 2008 May 15.
9
Do neighborhood and home contexts help explain why low-income children miss opportunities to participate in activities outside of school?邻里和家庭环境有助于解释为什么低收入儿童会错过校外活动的机会吗?
Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1545-62. doi: 10.1037/a0017359.
10
Emotional, developmental, and behavioral health of American children and their families: a report from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health.美国儿童及其家庭的情绪、发育和行为健康:2003年全国儿童健康调查的报告
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1202-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2606.