Department of Psychiatry, New York Medical College, New York, USA.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;24(6):568-77. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2012.741575.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is in the process of revising the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) and ICD-11 has an anticipated publication date of 2015. The Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health (WGSDSH) is charged with evaluating clinical and research data to inform the revision of diagnostic categories related to sexuality and gender identity that are currently included in the mental and behavioural disorders chapter of ICD-10, and making initial recommendations regarding whether and how these categories should be represented in the ICD-11. The diagnostic classification of disorders related to (trans)gender identity is an area long characterized by lack of knowledge, misconceptions and controversy. The placement of these categories has shifted over time within both the ICD and the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), reflecting developing views about what to call these diagnoses, what they mean and where to place them. This article reviews several controversies generated by gender identity diagnoses in recent years. In both the ICD-11 and DSM-5 development processes, one challenge has been to find a balance between concerns related to the stigmatization of mental disorders and the need for diagnostic categories that facilitate access to healthcare. In this connection, this article discusses several human rights issues related to gender identity diagnoses, and explores the question of whether affected populations are best served by placement of these categories within the mental disorders section of the classification. The combined stigmatization of being transgender and of having a mental disorder diagnosis creates a doubly burdensome situation for this group, which may contribute adversely to health status and to the attainment and enjoyment of human rights. The ICD-11 Working Group on the Classification of Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health believes it is now appropriate to abandon a psychopathological model of transgender people based on 1940s conceptualizations of sexual deviance and to move towards a model that is (1) more reflective of current scientific evidence and best practices; (2) more responsive to the needs, experience, and human rights of this vulnerable population; and (3) more supportive of the provision of accessible and high-quality healthcare services.
世界卫生组织(WHO)正在修订《国际疾病分类与相关健康问题统计分类》(ICD),ICD-11 的预计出版日期为 2015 年。性障碍和性健康分类工作组(WGSDSH)负责评估临床和研究数据,为修订 ICD-10 精神和行为障碍章节中与性和性别认同相关的诊断类别提供信息,并就这些类别是否以及如何在 ICD-11 中体现提出初步建议。与(跨)性别认同相关的障碍的诊断分类长期以来一直以缺乏知识、误解和争议为特征。这些类别的位置在 ICD 和美国精神病学协会的《诊断和统计手册》(DSM)中随着时间的推移而变化,反映了对这些诊断的称呼、含义和位置的看法不断发展。本文回顾了近年来性别认同诊断引起的几个争议。在 ICD-11 和 DSM-5 的发展过程中,一个挑战是在与精神障碍污名化相关的问题和需要有助于获得医疗保健的诊断类别之间找到平衡。在这方面,本文讨论了与性别认同诊断相关的几个人权问题,并探讨了将这些类别置于分类的精神障碍部分是否最能为受影响人群服务的问题。跨性别和精神障碍诊断的双重污名化给这一群体带来了双重负担,可能对健康状况和人权的实现和享有产生不利影响。性障碍和性健康分类 ICD-11 工作组认为,现在应该放弃基于 20 世纪 40 年代性偏离概念的跨性别者的心理病理学模式,转而采用一种(1)更能反映当前科学证据和最佳实践的模式;(2)更能满足这一弱势群体的需求、经验和人权;(3)更能支持提供可及和高质量的医疗保健服务。