Suppr超能文献

多日镇痛的评价:依托考昔的双盲、随机对照试验,使用术后第三磨牙拔出牙科疼痛模型。

Evaluation of multiday analgesia with etoricoxib in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial using the postoperative third-molar extraction dental pain model.

机构信息

Jean Brown Research Inc., Salt Lake City, UT 84049, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2013 Jun;29(6):492-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318260c144.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the analgesic effects of etoricoxib and comparator agents on the second and third days after oral surgery.

METHODS

There were 588 patients initially randomized to placebo (n=46), etoricoxib 120 mg once daily (n=97), etoricoxib 90 mg once daily (n=191), ibuprofen 600 mg every 6 hours (n=192), and acetaminophen 600 mg/codeine 60 mg (A/C) every 6 hours (n=62) after third-molar extraction (≥2, ≥1 impacted) in a double-blind controlled trial. Patients were allowed flexible dosing on days 2 and 3; 46, 96, 190, 192, and 56 patients on placebo, etoricoxib 120 mg, etoricoxib 90 mg, ibuprofen, and A/C, respectively, continued to Day 2 of the study. Outcomes included Average and Worst Recall Pain Assessments (0 to 10 scale) and Global Assessments of Study Medication (0 to 4 scale). Rescue medication (acetaminophen 325 mg up to 4 times daily) usage was evaluated. Adverse experiences were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Average Pain Recall scores were lower than placebo for all active treatments on Day 2 but only for etoricoxib 120 and 90 mg on Day 3. Worst Pain Recall scores were lower than placebo for only etoricoxib 120 and 90 mg on Day 2; all treatment groups were similar on day 3. Rescue medicine was used on day 2 in 57% of placebo patients, whereas use in active treatments ranged from 18% to 23%; for Day 3, rescue was used in 22% of placebo patients, whereas use in active treatments ranged from 14% to 20%. Differences in mean Patient's Global Assessment of Study Medication scores were significant for etoricoxib versus placebo (P<0.001) and for etoricoxib versus A/C (P<0.010). Nausea and vomiting were among the most common adverse events with higher frequency in the A/C group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain control was most favorable for the etoricoxib doses and ibuprofen. Global Assessments of Study Medication continued to differentiate the treatments and demonstrated greater efficacy for etoricoxib on Days 2 and 3 compared with placebo and A/C (NCT00694369).

摘要

目的

评估依托考昔和对照药物在口腔手术后第二天和第三天的镇痛效果。

方法

共有 588 例患者最初随机分配至安慰剂组(n=46)、依托考昔 120mg 每日一次组(n=97)、依托考昔 90mg 每日一次组(n=191)、布洛芬 600mg 每 6 小时一次组(n=192)和扑热息痛 600mg/可待因 60mg(A/C)每 6 小时一次组(n=62),用于接受下颌第三磨牙(≥2 个,≥1 个阻生)拔除的双盲对照试验。在第 2 天和第 3 天,患者可灵活使用药物;分别有 46、96、190、192 和 56 例患者继续接受安慰剂、依托考昔 120mg、依托考昔 90mg、布洛芬和 A/C 治疗至研究的第 2 天。结局指标包括平均和最差回忆疼痛评估(0 至 10 分)和研究药物总体评估(0 至 4 分)。评估了急救药物(扑热息痛 325mg 每日最多 4 次)的使用情况。收集并评估了不良反应事件。

结果

在第 2 天,与安慰剂相比,所有活性治疗组的平均疼痛回忆评分均较低,但仅依托考昔 120mg 和 90mg 在第 3 天如此;在第 2 天,只有依托考昔 120mg 和 90mg 组的最差疼痛回忆评分低于安慰剂组;第 3 天,所有治疗组均相似。在第 2 天,安慰剂组有 57%的患者使用了急救药物,而在活性治疗组中,使用比例为 18%至 23%;在第 3 天,安慰剂组有 22%的患者使用了急救药物,而在活性治疗组中,使用比例为 14%至 20%。依托考昔与安慰剂相比(P<0.001)和依托考昔与 A/C 相比(P<0.010),患者对研究药物总体评估的差异有统计学意义。恶心和呕吐是最常见的不良反应,A/C 组发生频率更高。

结论

依托考昔和布洛芬的止痛效果最佳。对研究药物的总体评估继续区分了这些治疗方法,并显示依托考昔在第 2 天和第 3 天的疗效优于安慰剂和 A/C(NCT00694369)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验