School of Sport Science, Exercise & Health (M408), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
J Physiol. 2013 Mar 1;591(5):1265-75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247387. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
Abstract This randomized trial evaluated the impact of different exercise training modalities on the function and size of conduit arteries in healthy volunteers. Young (27 ± 5 years) healthy male subjects were randomized to undertake 6 months of either endurance training (ET; n = 10) or resistance training (RT; n = 13). High-resolution ultrasound was used to determine brachial, femoral and carotid artery diameter and wall thickness (IMT) and femoral and brachial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)-mediated dilatation. Improvements in peak oxygen uptake occurred with ET (from 3.6 ± 0.7 to 3.8 ± 0.6 l min(-1), P = 0.024) but not RT. Upper body muscular strength increased following RT (from 57.8 ± 17.7 to 69.0 ± 19.5 kg, P < 0.001), but not ET. Both groups exhibited increases in lean body mass (ET, 1.4 ± 1.8 kg and RT, 2.3 ± 1.3 kg, P < 0.05). Resistance training increased brachial artery resting diameter (from 3.8 ± 0.5 to 4.1 ± 0.4 mm, P < 0.05), peak FMD diameter (+0.2 ± 0.2 mm, P < 0.05) and GTN-mediated diameter (+0.3 ± 0.3 mm, P < 0.01), as well as brachial FMD (from 5.1 ± 2.2 to 7.0 ± 3.9%, P < 0.05). No improvements in any brachial parameters were observed following ET. Conversely, ET increased femoral artery resting diameter (from 6.2 ± 0.7 to 6.4 ± 0.6 mm, P < 0.05), peak FMD diameter (+0.4 ± 0.4 mm, P < 0.05) and GTN-induced diameter (+0.3 ± 0.3 mm, P < 0.05), as well as femoral FMD-to-GTN ratio (from 0.6 ± 0.3 to 1.1 ± 0.8, P < 0.05). Resistance training did not induce changes in femoral artery parameters. Carotid artery IMT decreased in response to both forms of training. These findings indicate that 6 months of supervised exercise training induced changes in brachial and femoral artery size and function and decreased carotid artery IMT. These impacts of both RT and ET would be expected to translate to decreased cardiovascular risk.
摘要 本随机试验评估了不同运动训练方式对健康志愿者的大、中动脉功能和结构的影响。年轻(27 ± 5 岁)健康男性志愿者被随机分为耐力训练(ET)组(n = 10)或抗阻训练(RT)组(n = 13),分别接受 6 个月的训练。应用高分辨率超声检测肱动脉、股动脉和颈动脉直径及内中膜厚度(IMT),以及肱动脉和股动脉血流介导的舒张功能(FMD)和硝酸甘油介导的舒张功能。ET 组的峰值摄氧量增加(从 3.6 ± 0.7 升至 3.8 ± 0.6 l/min,P = 0.024),而 RT 组没有改变。RT 组的上体肌肉力量增加(从 57.8 ± 17.7 升至 69.0 ± 19.5 kg,P < 0.001),而 ET 组没有改变。两组的瘦体重均增加(ET 组增加 1.4 ± 1.8 kg,RT 组增加 2.3 ± 1.3 kg,P < 0.05)。RT 组的肱动脉静息直径增加(从 3.8 ± 0.5 升至 4.1 ± 0.4 mm,P < 0.05),肱动脉峰值 FMD 直径增加(增加 0.2 ± 0.2 mm,P < 0.05),硝酸甘油介导的肱动脉直径增加(增加 0.3 ± 0.3 mm,P < 0.01),肱动脉 FMD 增加(从 5.1 ± 2.2 升至 7.0 ± 3.9%,P < 0.05)。ET 组的任何肱动脉参数均没有改变。相反,ET 组的股动脉静息直径增加(从 6.2 ± 0.7 升至 6.4 ± 0.6 mm,P < 0.05),股动脉峰值 FMD 直径增加(增加 0.4 ± 0.4 mm,P < 0.05),硝酸甘油介导的股动脉直径增加(增加 0.3 ± 0.3 mm,P < 0.05),股动脉 FMD 与硝酸甘油比值增加(从 0.6 ± 0.3 升至 1.1 ± 0.8,P < 0.05)。RT 组的股动脉参数没有改变。两种训练方式都使颈动脉 IMT 降低。这些发现表明,6 个月的监督运动训练改变了肱动脉和股动脉的大小和功能,降低了颈动脉 IMT。RT 和 ET 的这些影响预计会降低心血管风险。