School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Jul;24(7):635-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Exercise places physiological demands upon the cardiovascular system, subsequently leading to adaptations in structure and function. Different exercise modalities (endurance, strength and power) lead to distinct hemodynamic demands and, possibly, different patterns of adaptation. Our aim was to assess and compare brachial and femoral artery function and structure in elite level athletes engaged in endurance, strength and power sports.
cross sectional comparison.
30 male elite athletes (runners n=10, powerlifters n=11, weightlifters n=9) and 23 healthy controls were recruited. Brachial and femoral arterial diameters were assessed using ultrasound. Arterial function (brachial and femoral arteries) was determined using the flow mediated dilation (FMD) technique and body composition using body mass index (BMI) and body surface area (BSA).
Weightlifters had significantly larger brachial arterial diameters compared to controls (4.39±0.34 vs 3.86±0.42mm, p<0.01). As weightlifter and power athletes had significantly higher body mass, BMI and BSA, we adjusted diameter for BSA. BSA-correction ameliorated differences in brachial artery resting diameters between athletes and controls. However, BSA-corrected femoral artery diameter was significantly larger in runners compared to controls (3.51±0.28 vs 3.25±0.34mm, p<0.05). There were no differences in brachial FMD between groups. Femoral artery FMD was significantly higher in runners and weightlifters compared to controls (p<0.05 for both groups).
Heterogeneous, limb-specific structural and functional vascular adaptation is evident in athletes, which may be influenced by exercise modality. Further, vascular remodelling relates to differences in body shape, specifically body composition, which should be accounted for when comparing athletes.
运动对心血管系统施加生理需求,随后导致结构和功能的适应性改变。不同的运动方式(耐力、力量和力量)导致不同的血液动力学需求,并可能导致不同的适应模式。我们的目的是评估和比较从事耐力、力量和力量运动的精英运动员的肱动脉和股动脉功能和结构。
横断面比较。
招募了 30 名男性精英运动员(跑步者 10 名,举重运动员 11 名,举重运动员 9 名)和 23 名健康对照者。使用超声评估肱动脉和股动脉直径。使用血流介导的扩张(FMD)技术评估动脉功能(肱动脉和股动脉),并使用体重指数(BMI)和体表面积(BSA)评估身体成分。
举重运动员的肱动脉直径明显大于对照组(4.39±0.34 对 3.86±0.42mm,p<0.01)。由于举重运动员和力量运动员的体重、BMI 和 BSA 明显较高,我们根据 BSA 调整了直径。BSA 校正改善了运动员和对照组之间肱动脉静息直径的差异。然而,与对照组相比,跑步者的股动脉直径校正后的直径明显更大(3.51±0.28 对 3.25±0.34mm,p<0.05)。各组之间的肱动脉 FMD 没有差异。跑步者和举重运动员的股动脉 FMD 明显高于对照组(两组均 p<0.05)。
运动员中存在明显的、肢体特异性的结构性和功能性血管适应性,这可能受到运动方式的影响。此外,血管重塑与体型差异有关,特别是身体成分,在比较运动员时应考虑到这一点。