Vandenplas Y, Goyvaerts H, Helven R
Academisch Ziekenhuis-Kinderen, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1990 Apr;10(3):322-6. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199004000-00010.
Esophageal pH monitoring data are influenced by numerous patient- and/or technical equipment-related factors. In this study, data obtained with 10 pH recording devices of two different companies and 10 pH glass-microelectrodes with an external reference electrode of one company, calibrated by different persons, were compared. Pearson correlation coefficients regarding the reflux index (the percentage of the investigation time with a pH less than 4) ranged from 0.93 to 1.00. The lowest correlation coefficient (0.73) was obtained by comparing the number of episodes with a pH less than 4 recorded with devices from different companies. These results suggest that differences in pH monitoring data recorded in comparable conditions with one type of pH electrode are irrelevant as far as clinical routine investigations are concerned. Data are not significantly influenced by the recording devices themselves, the age of the electrodes, or the skin-potential differences induced by the person calibrating the probes.
食管pH监测数据受众多与患者和/或技术设备相关的因素影响。在本研究中,比较了由两家不同公司生产的10台pH记录设备以及由一家公司生产的带有外部参比电极的10支pH玻璃微电极所获得的数据,这些设备和电极由不同人员进行校准。关于反流指数(pH值小于4的检查时间百分比)的Pearson相关系数范围为0.93至1.00。通过比较不同公司设备记录的pH值小于4的发作次数,得到了最低的相关系数(0.73)。这些结果表明,就临床常规检查而言,在可比条件下使用一种类型的pH电极记录的pH监测数据差异无关紧要。数据不受记录设备本身、电极使用时长或校准探头人员所引起的皮肤电位差异的显著影响。