• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经仪器喂养对儿童味觉体验的影响。

The impact of instrumental feeding on children's responses to taste exposure.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Oct;26(5):415-20. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12028. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1111/jhn.12028
PMID:23252829
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a recent study, we showed that nonfood incentives combined with taste exposure increase children's acceptance of vegetables. However, the impact of children's previous experience of receiving food rewards is unknown. The present study investigated whether the experience of food rewards affects responses to an exposure-plus-reward intervention.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-seven parents of 4-6-year-old children taking part in an exposure-based intervention study completed an instrumental feeding (IF) questionnaire aiming to assess their use of food rewards. Based on these scores, children were categorised as frequently or rarely instrumentally-fed. Intervention groups were given 12 daily tastes of a target vegetable combined with no reward, a tangible reward, (sticker) or a verbal reward (praise). A no-treatment control group received no tastings. Liking and intake of a target vegetable were measured at baseline and post-intervention.

RESULTS

Irrespective of experience of IF, children in all intervention groups increased liking compared to controls (all P < 0.001) and both reward groups increased intake compared to controls (both P < 0.05). However, in the nonrewarded exposure group, only children with a limited experience with food rewards increased consumption (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Experience of IF may limit the benefits of 'mere exposure'. However, exposure with nonfood rewards can increase the acceptance of vegetables, regardless of previous experience.

摘要

背景

在最近的一项研究中,我们发现非食物奖励与味觉暴露相结合可以提高儿童对蔬菜的接受度。然而,儿童之前接受食物奖励的经验的影响尚不清楚。本研究调查了食物奖励的经验是否会影响暴露加奖励干预的反应。

方法

137 名 4-6 岁儿童的家长参与了一项基于暴露的干预研究,他们完成了一项工具喂养(IF)问卷,旨在评估他们使用食物奖励的情况。根据这些分数,儿童被分为经常或很少接受工具喂养。干预组每天接受 12 次目标蔬菜的味觉体验,同时不给予奖励、给予有形奖励(贴纸)或口头奖励(表扬)。对照组不进行味觉体验。在基线和干预后测量对目标蔬菜的喜爱程度和摄入量。

结果

无论是否有 IF 经验,所有干预组的儿童与对照组相比,喜爱程度都有所增加(均 P < 0.001),奖励组的摄入量均高于对照组(均 P < 0.05)。然而,在无奖励的暴露组中,只有那些有有限食物奖励经验的儿童增加了消费(P < 0.05)。

结论

IF 经验可能会限制“单纯暴露”的益处。然而,即使没有食物奖励,暴露也可以增加对蔬菜的接受度,而不受之前经验的影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of instrumental feeding on children's responses to taste exposure.经仪器喂养对儿童味觉体验的影响。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Oct;26(5):415-20. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12028. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
2
Increasing food acceptance in the home setting: a randomized controlled trial of parent-administered taste exposure with incentives.增加家庭环境中的食物接受度:一项基于家长激励的味觉暴露的随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jan;95(1):72-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024596. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
3
Eating for pleasure or profit: the effect of incentives on children's enjoyment of vegetables.为了愉悦或利益而进食:激励对儿童享用蔬菜的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):190-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797610394662. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
4
Facilitating or undermining? The effect of reward on food acceptance. A narrative review.促进还是破坏?奖励对食物接受的影响。一篇叙述性综述。
Appetite. 2011 Oct;57(2):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
5
Parent-administered exposure to increase children's vegetable acceptance: a randomized controlled trial.家长管理式暴露增加儿童对蔬菜的接受度:一项随机对照试验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Jun;114(6):881-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.040. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
6
Rewards can be used effectively with repeated exposure to increase liking of vegetables in 4-6-year-old children.奖励可以通过反复接触有效地使用,以增加 4-6 岁儿童对蔬菜的喜爱。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 May;16(5):942-51. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002035. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
7
'Why don't you try it again?' A comparison of parent led, home based interventions aimed at increasing children's consumption of a disliked vegetable.“你为什么不再试一次呢?”一项比较父母主导、以家庭为基础的干预措施,旨在增加儿童对不喜欢的蔬菜的消费。
Appetite. 2015 Apr;87:215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.216. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
"Miffy eats the rainbow!" - A colorful modeling- and reward-based intervention to increase willingness to taste fruit and vegetables in 3-7-year-old children.“米菲兔吃彩虹!”——一种基于色彩建模和奖励的干预措施,旨在提高 3-7 岁儿童尝试水果和蔬菜的意愿。
Appetite. 2024 Dec 1;203:107654. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107654. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
9
Modifying children's food preferences: the effects of exposure and reward on acceptance of an unfamiliar vegetable.改变儿童的食物偏好:接触和奖励对接受一种不熟悉蔬菜的影响。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Feb;57(2):341-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601541.
10
Peas, please! Food familiarization through picture books helps parents introduce vegetables into preschoolers' diets.请吃豌豆!通过图画书让孩子熟悉食物有助于父母将蔬菜引入学龄前儿童的饮食中。
Appetite. 2018 Sep 1;128:32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.140. Epub 2018 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Lingual Tactile Sensitivity in Children and Adults: Methodological Suitability and Challenges.儿童和成人舌部触觉敏感性评估:方法的适用性与挑战
Foods. 2020 Nov 3;9(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/foods9111594.
2
Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under.增加五岁及以下儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 25;5(5):CD008552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008552.pub7.
3
Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under.
增加五岁及以下儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 7;2019(11):CD008552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008552.pub6.
4
Repeated exposure and conditioning strategies for increasing vegetable liking and intake: systematic review and meta-analyses of the published literature.反复暴露和条件作用策略对增加蔬菜喜爱度和摄入量的影响:已发表文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct 1;108(4):842-856. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy143.
5
Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under.增加五岁及以下儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 17;5(5):CD008552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008552.pub5.
6
Mothers' self-reported grocery shopping behaviours with their 2- to 7-year-old children: relationship between feeding practices and mothers' willingness to purchase child-requested nutrient-poor, marketed foods, and fruits and vegetables.母亲与 2 至 7 岁儿童一起购买食品的行为:喂养行为与母亲购买儿童要求的营养差、有市场推广的食物及水果和蔬菜的意愿之间的关系。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(18):3343-3348. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002142. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
A Systematic Review of Methods for Increasing Vegetable Consumption in Early Childhood.一项关于增加幼儿期蔬菜摄入量方法的系统综述。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2017;6(2):157-170. doi: 10.1007/s13668-017-0202-1. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
8
Providers' response to child eating behaviors: A direct observation study.提供者对儿童饮食行为的反应:一项直接观察研究。
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:534-41. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
9
Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research.食物养育行为的基本构成要素:一份指导未来研究的内容图谱。
Nutr Rev. 2016 Feb;74(2):98-117. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv061. Epub 2016 Jan 2.