Division of Chemistry & Structural Biology, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013 Jan;81(1):136-47. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12055.
The suite of currently used drugs can be divided into two categories - traditional 'small molecule' drugs with typical molecular weights of <500 Da but with oral bioavailability, and much larger 'biologics' typically >5000 Da that are not orally bioavailable and need to be delivered via injection. Due to their small size, conventional small molecule drugs may suffer from reduced target selectivity that often ultimately manifests in human side-effects, whereas protein therapeutics tend to be exquisitely specific for their targets due to many more interactions with them, but this comes at a cost of low bioavailability, poor membrane permeability, and metabolic instability. The time has now come to reinvestigate new drug leads that fit between these two molecular weight extremes, with the goal of combining advantages of small molecules (cost, conformational restriction, membrane permeability, metabolic stability, oral bioavailability) with those of proteins (natural components, target specificity, high potency). This article uses selected examples of peptides to highlight the importance of peptide drugs, some potential new opportunities for their exploitation, and some difficult challenges ahead in this field.
目前使用的药物可分为两类 - 传统的“小分子”药物,分子量通常<500Da,但具有口服生物利用度,以及分子量通常>5000Da 的“生物制剂”,没有口服生物利用度,需要通过注射给药。由于其体积小,常规的小分子药物可能会降低对目标的选择性,这通常最终会导致人体产生副作用,而蛋白质治疗剂由于与目标有更多的相互作用,往往对其目标具有极高的特异性,但这是以低生物利用度、较差的膜通透性和代谢不稳定性为代价的。现在是时候重新研究介于这两种分子量极端之间的新药先导物了,其目标是结合小分子的优势(成本、构象限制、膜通透性、代谢稳定性、口服生物利用度)和蛋白质的优势(天然成分、目标特异性、高效力)。本文使用肽的选定示例来强调肽类药物的重要性、它们在这一领域的一些潜在新机会,以及未来的一些困难挑战。