Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚、七氟醚、瑞芬太尼和(S)-氯胺酮在亚麻醉浓度下对内脏和躯体感觉痛诱发电位的影响。

Effects of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (S)-ketamine in subanesthetic concentrations on visceral and somatosensory pain-evoked potentials.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Helios Clinic Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):308-17. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fb21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although electroencephalographic parameters and auditory evoked potentials (AEP) reflect the hypnotic component of anesthesia, there is currently no specific and mechanism-based monitoring tool for anesthesia-induced blockade of nociceptive inputs. The aim of this study was to assess visceral pain-evoked potentials (VPEP) and contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEP) as electroencephalographic indicators of drug-induced changes of visceral and somatosensory pain. Additionally, AEP and electroencephalographic permutation entropy were used to evaluate sedative components of the applied drugs.

METHODS

In a study enrolling 60 volunteers, VPEP, CHEP (amplitude N2-P1), and AEP (latency Nb, amplitude Pa-Nb) were recorded without drug application and at two subanesthetic concentration levels of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, or (s)-ketamine. Drug-induced changes of evoked potentials were analyzed. VPEP were generated by electric stimuli using bipolar electrodes positioned in the distal esophagus. For CHEP, heat pulses were given to the medial aspect of the right forearm using a CHEP stimulator. In addition to AEP, electroencephalographic permutation entropy was used to indicate level of sedation.

RESULTS

With increasing concentrations of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (s)-ketamine, VPEP and CHEP N2-P1 amplitudes decreased. AEP and electroencephalographic permutation entropy showed neither clinically relevant nor statistically significant suppression of cortical activity during drug application.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreasing VPEP and CHEP amplitudes under subanesthetic concentrations of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (s)-ketamine indicate suppressive drug effects. These effects seem to be specific for analgesia.

摘要

背景

尽管脑电图参数和听觉诱发电位(AEP)反映了麻醉的催眠成分,但目前还没有专门用于监测麻醉诱导的伤害性传入阻断的基于机制的监测工具。本研究旨在评估内脏痛诱发电位(VPEP)和接触热诱发电位(CHEP)作为反映药物诱导内脏和躯体疼痛变化的脑电图指标。此外,还使用 AEP 和脑电图排列熵来评估应用药物的镇静成分。

方法

在一项纳入 60 名志愿者的研究中,在未应用药物和丙泊酚、七氟醚、瑞芬太尼或(s)-氯胺酮两种亚麻醉浓度水平下,记录 VPEP、CHEP(N2-P1 幅度)和 AEP(Nb 潜伏期、Pa-Nb 幅度)。分析诱发电位的药物诱导变化。VPEP 是通过在远端食管放置双极电极用电流刺激产生的。对于 CHEP,使用 CHEP 刺激器在右前臂内侧给予热脉冲。除了 AEP,还使用脑电图排列熵来指示镇静水平。

结果

随着丙泊酚、七氟醚、瑞芬太尼和(s)-氯胺酮浓度的增加,VPEP 和 CHEP N2-P1 幅度降低。在药物应用期间,AEP 和脑电图排列熵均未显示出皮质活动的临床相关或统计学显著抑制。

结论

在丙泊酚、七氟醚、瑞芬太尼和(s)-氯胺酮的亚麻醉浓度下,VPEP 和 CHEP 幅度降低表明药物有抑制作用。这些作用似乎是特定于镇痛的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验