Suppr超能文献

用于测量疼痛的非侵入性客观标志物:开发疼痛测量设备的方向——一篇叙述性综述

Non-Invasive Objective Markers to Measure Pain: A Direction to Develop a Pain Device - A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Shekhar Varun, Choudhary Nandan, Rathore Puneet, Singh Suraj Pal, Bhatnagar Sushma

机构信息

Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. B.R.A. IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Apr-Jun;29(2):217-222. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_257_2022. Epub 2023 May 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding non-invasive objective measurements of pain. Measuring pain is of uttermost importance, but it can be an inconvenient task, especially in terms of the interpretation of patient's information. Reiterating, there is no "standard" that provides the physician with a method to objectively quantify this problem of patient's pain. For assessing the pain, physician relies solely on unidimensional assessment tools or questionnaire-based pain assessment. Although pain is a subjective experience of the patient, but there is a need to measure pain sometimes in the individuals who cannot communicate their quality and severity of pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The articles from PubMed and Google Scholar without any year and age limit were searched in the current narrative review. A total of 16 markers were searched and their relation to pain was studied.

RESULTS

Studies have shown that these markers change in relation to pain and it can be considered a valuable tool for pain measurement but there are multiple factors like psychological and emotional factors which affect these markers.

CONCLUSION

There is lack of evidence to show which marker can be used for measuring pain accurately. This narrative review is an attempt to look into the various pain-related markers that can be used and it calls for further studies including clinical trials with different diseases and taking into accounts different factors affecting pain to give an accurate measurement of pain.

摘要

目的

回顾关于疼痛无创客观测量的文献。测量疼痛至关重要,但这可能是一项麻烦的任务,尤其是在解读患者信息方面。重申一下,没有“标准”能为医生提供客观量化患者疼痛问题的方法。为了评估疼痛,医生仅依赖一维评估工具或基于问卷的疼痛评估。尽管疼痛是患者的主观体验,但有时对于那些无法表达疼痛性质和严重程度的个体,仍需要测量疼痛。

材料与方法

在当前的叙述性综述中,检索了来自PubMed和谷歌学术的无年份和年龄限制的文章。共检索了16种标志物,并研究了它们与疼痛的关系。

结果

研究表明,这些标志物会随疼痛而变化,可被视为疼痛测量的有价值工具,但存在多种因素,如心理和情感因素,会影响这些标志物。

结论

缺乏证据表明哪种标志物可用于准确测量疼痛。本叙述性综述旨在探讨可使用的各种与疼痛相关的标志物,并呼吁开展进一步研究,包括针对不同疾病的临床试验,并考虑影响疼痛的不同因素,以准确测量疼痛。

相似文献

4
5
Current Trends in Modalities of Pain Assessment: A Narrative Review.当前疼痛评估方式的趋势:叙述性综述。
Neurol India. 2024 Sep 1;72(5):951-966. doi: 10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00665. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
10

本文引用的文献

8
Electroencephalography.脑电图。
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 4;29(3):R80-R85. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.052.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验