• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

N 路敏感性分析:一种用于完全主观决策分析树的验证和稳定性评估技术。

N-way sensitivity analysis: a verification and stability-assessment technique for completely subjective decision analysis trees.

作者信息

Hughes C, Hughes K K

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):68-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000110.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9001000110
PMID:2325527
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of N-way sensitivity analysis, a modified version of traditional sensitivity analysis that was created for the purpose of verifying the stability of decisions made by a completely subjective decision-analytic tree. The technique was developed during research that addressed whether nurses make clinical decisions that coincide with those recommended by a decision-analytic model. Since all parameters of the model were derived from subjective assessment, traditional one-way or two-way sensitivity analysis was deemed inappropriate. Consequently, N-way sensitivity analysis was developed and used for the verification of the decision model's results.

摘要

本文的目的是描述N向敏感性分析的发展,它是传统敏感性分析的一种改进版本,旨在验证完全主观的决策分析树所做决策的稳定性。该技术是在一项研究中开发的,该研究探讨了护士做出的临床决策是否与决策分析模型推荐的决策一致。由于模型的所有参数均来自主观评估,因此传统的单向或双向敏感性分析被认为不合适。因此,开发了N向敏感性分析并将其用于验证决策模型的结果。

相似文献

1
N-way sensitivity analysis: a verification and stability-assessment technique for completely subjective decision analysis trees.N 路敏感性分析:一种用于完全主观决策分析树的验证和稳定性评估技术。
Med Decis Making. 1990 Jan-Mar;10(1):68-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9001000110.
2
A decision-analytic approach to clinical nursing.
Nurs Res. 1994 Jul-Aug;43(4):245-9.
3
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
4
[Nursing diagnosis and scientific knowledge].[护理诊断与科学知识]
Prof Inferm. 1997 Apr-Jun;50(2):7-13.
5
Classifying clinical decision making: interpreting nursing intuition, heuristics and medical diagnosis.临床决策的分类:解读护理直觉、启发法与医学诊断
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):990-8.
6
Uncertainty and the value of diagnostic information, with application to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer.
Stat Med. 2004 Mar 15;23(5):843-55. doi: 10.1002/sim.1623.
7
Structured analysis: methodology for developing a model for defining nursing information system requirements.结构化分析:开发用于定义护理信息系统需求的模型的方法
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1990 Dec;13(2):53-62. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199012000-00007.
8
How do children's nurses make clinical decisions? Two preliminary studies.儿童护士如何做出临床决策?两项初步研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1324-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01453.x.
9
Clinical decision-making of rural novice nurses.农村新手护士的临床决策
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(3):1726. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
10
Factored stochastic trees: a tool for solving complex temporal medical decision models.因子随机树:一种用于求解复杂时间医学决策模型的工具。
Med Decis Making. 1993 Jul-Sep;13(3):227-36. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9301300309.