• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[护理诊断与科学知识]

[Nursing diagnosis and scientific knowledge].

作者信息

Zanotti R

机构信息

International Institute of Nursing Research-Padova-Docente Università di Padova.

出版信息

Prof Inferm. 1997 Apr-Jun;50(2):7-13.

PMID:9687263
Abstract

In this paper the author analyzes commonalities and differences between scientific inquiry and diagnostic assessment, to highlight the thought and method rigorousness implied in the nursing diagnosis. The first part of the paper is dedicated to explore the relationship between the subjectivity of the heuristic attitude and the objectivity of the scientific methodology. In the second part, the use of inductive and deductive approaches in diagnostic inquiry are compared and the validity of their outcomes is discussed. Finally, the last section describes concepts and methods mostly used and is completed by an analysis of criteria for classification useable in nursing diagnosis.

摘要

在本文中,作者分析了科学探究与诊断评估之间的异同,以突出护理诊断中所蕴含的思维和方法的严谨性。本文的第一部分致力于探讨启发式态度的主观性与科学方法的客观性之间的关系。在第二部分中,比较了诊断探究中归纳法和演绎法的运用,并讨论了其结果的有效性。最后,最后一部分描述了最常用的概念和方法,并通过对可用于护理诊断的分类标准的分析来完成。

相似文献

1
[Nursing diagnosis and scientific knowledge].[护理诊断与科学知识]
Prof Inferm. 1997 Apr-Jun;50(2):7-13.
2
Classifying clinical decision making: interpreting nursing intuition, heuristics and medical diagnosis.临床决策的分类:解读护理直觉、启发法与医学诊断
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):990-8.
3
Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evaluation of ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP.符合护理诊断分类标准:对国际护理实践分类法(ICNP)、国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)、北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)及德国护理诊断分类法(ZEFP)的评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):702-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
4
Qualitative concept development: implications for nursing research and knowledge.质性概念发展:对护理研究与知识的影响
Nurs Forum. 2006 Jul-Sep;41(3):103-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2006.00045.x.
5
[Nursing diagnosis and problems of nursing classification].[护理诊断与护理分类问题]
Osterr Krankenpflegez. 2000 Apr;53(4):22-6.
6
Using NANDA, NIC, and NOC (NNN) language for clinical reasoning with the Outcome-Present State-Test (OPT) model.使用北美护理诊断协会(NANDA)、护理干预分类(NIC)和护理结局分类(NOC)(NNN)语言,结合结局-现状-测试(OPT)模型进行临床推理。
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2006 Jul-Sep;17(3):129-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2006.00033.x.
7
Evidence for practice, epistemology, and critical reflection.实践、认识论及批判性反思的证据
Nurs Philos. 2006 Oct;7(4):216-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00267.x.
8
A crisis in critical thinking.批判性思维的危机。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Sep-Oct;26(5):278-82.
9
The expert nurse profile and diagnostic content validity of Sedentary Lifestyle: the Spanish validation.
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007 Jul-Sep;18(3):84-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2007.00056.x.
10
[Nursing diagnosis: as a part of the nursing care process].护理诊断:作为护理程序的一部分
Rev Cubana Enferm. 1990 Jan-Apr;6(1):5-18.