Ezendam Nicole P M, Brug Johannes, Borsboom Gerard, van Empelen Pepijn, Oenema Anke
1 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
4 TNO Life Style, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Feb;17(2):431-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012005344. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
To explore whether the effects on dietary behaviours of a computer-tailored intervention aimed to prevent excessive weight gain among adolescents, FATaintPHAT, were moderated by sociodemographic, cognitive and home environmental factors.
A two-group cluster randomized trial. Potential moderation of the outcome measures (consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, snacks, fruits and vegetables) was studied by gender, education level, ethnicity, awareness of risk behaviour, intention and home availability.
Twenty schools in the Netherlands.
Students (n 883) aged 12-13 years.
Of the twenty-four interactions tested, only three were significant. The intervention effect on sugar-sweetened beverages was moderated by level of education (P = 0·009); intervention effects were found only among academic preparatory students. The intervention effects on fruit and vegetable intake were moderated by awareness of fruit intake (P < 0·001) and home availability of vegetables (P = 0·007); an effect on fruit intake was found only among students who were aware of their low fruit intake at baseline and an effect on vegetable consumption was found only among students who reported that vegetables were always available at their home.
The effects of the intervention generally did not differ between sociodemographic subgroups. The moderation by home availability illustrates that the environment may influence the effects of educational interventions.
探讨旨在预防青少年体重过度增加的计算机定制干预措施FATaintPHAT对饮食行为的影响是否受到社会人口统计学、认知和家庭环境因素的调节。
两组整群随机试验。通过性别、教育水平、种族、风险行为意识、意愿和家庭可获得性研究了对结果指标(含糖饮料、零食、水果和蔬菜的消费)的潜在调节作用。
荷兰的20所学校。
12至13岁的学生(n = 883)。
在测试的24种相互作用中,只有3种具有显著性。对含糖饮料的干预效果受教育水平的调节(P = 0.009);仅在学术预备学生中发现了干预效果。对水果和蔬菜摄入量的干预效果受水果摄入量意识(P < 0.001)和家庭蔬菜可获得性(P = 0.007)的调节;仅在基线时意识到自己水果摄入量低的学生中发现了对水果摄入量的影响,仅在报告家中总是有蔬菜的学生中发现了对蔬菜消费的影响。
干预效果在社会人口统计学亚组之间通常没有差异。家庭可获得性的调节作用表明环境可能会影响教育干预的效果。