Santangeli Pasquale, Giglio Ada Francesca, Di Biase Luigi, Natale Andrea
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2013 Jan;14(1):12-8. doi: 10.1714/1207.13368.
In patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy, catheter ablation is effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm, in reducing hospitalization and improving quality of life. On the other hand, the role of catheter ablation as first-line therapy for atrial fibrillation is still controversial and has been recently evaluated by two randomized controlled trials and two consecutive case series. These studies showed the superiority of catheter ablation over antiarrhythmic therapy for the rhythm control of atrial fibrillation, with similar rates of complications between the two groups. According to these results, catheter ablation could be considered as first-line therapy for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without significant heart disease.
对于抗心律失常治疗无效的有症状心房颤动患者,导管消融在恢复和维持窦性心律、减少住院次数及改善生活质量方面有效。另一方面,导管消融作为心房颤动一线治疗方法的作用仍存在争议,最近有两项随机对照试验和两个连续病例系列对此进行了评估。这些研究表明,在心房颤动的节律控制方面,导管消融优于抗心律失常治疗,两组并发症发生率相似。根据这些结果,对于无明显心脏病的有症状阵发性心房颤动患者,可考虑将导管消融作为一线治疗方法。