Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences-INEF, Technical University of Madrid, C/Martín Fierro 7, Madrid 28040, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 21;12:1100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1100.
At present, scientific consensus exists on the multifactorial etiopatogenia of obesity. Both professionals and researchers agree that treatment must also have a multifactorial approach, including diet, physical activity, pharmacology and/or surgical treatment. These two last ones should be reserved for those cases of morbid obesities or in case of failure of the previous ones. The aim of the PRONAF study is to determine what type of exercise combined with caloric restriction is the most appropriate to be included in overweigth and obesity intervention programs, and the aim of this paper is to describe the design and the evaluation methods used to carry out the PRONAF study.
METHODS/DESIGN: One-hundred nineteen overweight (46 males) and 120 obese (61 males) subjects aged 18-50 years were randomly assigned to a strength training group, an endurance training group, a combined strength + endurance training group or a diet and physical activity recommendations group. The intervention period was 22 weeks (in all cases 3 times/wk of training for 22 weeks and 2 weeks for pre and post evaluation). All subjects followed a hypocaloric diet (25-30% less energy intake than the daily energy expenditure estimated by accelerometry). 29-34% of the total energy intake came from fat, 14-20% from protein, and 50-55% from carbohydrates. The mayor outcome variables assesed were, biochemical and inflamatory markers, body composition, energy balance, physical fitness, nutritional habits, genetic profile and quality of life. 180 (75.3%) subjects finished the study, with a dropout rate of 24.7%. Dropout reasons included: personal reasons 17 (28.8%), low adherence to exercise 3 (5.1%), low adherence to diet 6 (10.2%), job change 6 (10.2%), and lost interest 27 (45.8%).
Feasibility of the study has been proven, with a low dropout rate which corresponds to the estimated sample size. Transfer of knowledge is foreseen as a spin-off, in order that overweight and obese subjects can benefit from the results. The aim is to transfer it to sports centres. Effectiveness on individual health-related parameter in order to determine the most effective training programme will be analysed in forthcoming publications.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01116856.
目前,科学界对于肥胖的多因素病因有共识。专业人士和研究人员都认为,治疗也必须采取多因素方法,包括饮食、身体活动、药理学和/或手术治疗。后两种方法应保留给病态肥胖或前一种方法失败的病例。PRONAF 研究的目的是确定哪种类型的运动与热量限制相结合最适合纳入超重和肥胖干预计划,本文旨在描述开展 PRONAF 研究时所使用的设计和评估方法。
方法/设计:119 名超重(46 名男性)和 120 名肥胖(61 名男性)年龄在 18-50 岁的受试者被随机分配到力量训练组、耐力训练组、力量+耐力联合训练组或饮食和身体活动建议组。干预期为 22 周(所有情况下每周 3 次训练 22 周,前后评估各 2 周)。所有受试者均遵循低热量饮食(根据加速度计估计的每日能量消耗减少 25-30%)。总能量摄入的 29-34%来自脂肪,14-20%来自蛋白质,50-55%来自碳水化合物。评估的主要结果变量包括生化和炎症标志物、身体成分、能量平衡、体能、营养习惯、基因谱和生活质量。180 名(75.3%)受试者完成了研究,失访率为 24.7%。失访原因包括:个人原因 17 例(28.8%)、运动依从性低 3 例(5.1%)、饮食依从性低 6 例(10.2%)、工作变动 6 例(10.2%)、兴趣丧失 27 例(45.8%)。
研究的可行性已得到证明,失访率低,符合估计的样本量。预计会有知识转移,以便超重和肥胖的受试者能够从研究结果中受益。目的是将其转移到体育中心。为了确定最有效的训练方案,将在后续出版物中分析对个体健康相关参数的有效性。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01116856。