• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下取出治疗良性食管疾病后自膨式支架的安全性。

Safety of endoscopic removal of self-expandable stents after treatment of benign esophageal diseases.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan;77(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.001
PMID:23261092
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Temporary placement of self-expandable stents has been increasingly used for the management of benign esophageal diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of endoscopic removal of esophageal self-expandable stents placed for the treatment of benign esophageal diseases.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

SETTING

Six tertiary care centers in the United States and Europe.

PATIENTS

A total of 214 patients with benign esophageal diseases undergoing endoscopic stent removal.

INTERVENTION

Endoscopic stent removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Endoscopic techniques for stent removal, time to stent removal, and adverse events related to stent removal.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients underwent a total of 329 stent extractions. Stents were mainly placed for refractory strictures (49.2%) and fistulae (49.8%). Of the removed stents, 52% were fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs), 28.6% were partially covered self-expandable metal stents (PCSEMSs), and 19.5% were self-expandable plastic stents. A total of 35 (10.6%) procedure-related adverse events were reported, including 7 (2.1%) major adverse events. Multivariate analysis revealed that use of PCSEMSs (P < .001) was a risk factor for adverse events during stent removal. Favorable factors for successful stent removal were FCSEMSs (P ≤ .012) and stent migration (P = .010). No significant associations were found for stent indwelling time (P = .145) and stent embedding (P = .194).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective analysis, only tertiary care centers.

CONCLUSIONS

With an acceptable major adverse event rate of 2.1%, esophageal stent removal in the setting of benign disease was found to be a safe and feasible procedure. FCSEMSs were more successfully removed than self-expandable plastic stents and PCSEMSs. Adverse events caused by stent removal were not time dependent.

摘要

背景

自膨式支架的临时放置已越来越多地用于治疗良性食管疾病。

目的

评估内镜下切除用于治疗良性食管疾病的自膨式食管支架的安全性。

设计

多中心回顾性研究。

设置

美国和欧洲的 6 家三级护理中心。

患者

214 名良性食管疾病患者行内镜下支架取出术。

干预

内镜下支架取出术。

主要观察指标

支架取出的内镜技术、支架取出时间和与支架取出相关的不良事件。

结果

共 214 例患者共进行了 329 次支架取出术。放置支架主要是为了治疗难治性狭窄(49.2%)和瘘管(49.8%)。取出的支架中,52%为完全覆膜自膨式金属支架(FCSEMSs),28.6%为部分覆膜自膨式金属支架(PCSEMSs),19.5%为自膨式塑料支架。共报告了 35 例(10.6%)与操作相关的不良事件,包括 7 例(2.1%)严重不良事件。多变量分析显示,使用 PCSEMSs(P<.001)是支架取出过程中发生不良事件的危险因素。支架成功取出的有利因素是 FCSEMSs(P≤.012)和支架迁移(P=.010)。支架留置时间(P=.145)和支架嵌入(P=.194)与不良事件无显著相关性。

局限性

回顾性分析,仅为三级护理中心。

结论

良性疾病中,食管支架取出术的主要不良事件发生率为 2.1%,是一种安全可行的方法。FCSEMSs 比自膨式塑料支架和 PCSEMSs 更容易取出。支架取出引起的不良事件与时间无关。

相似文献

1
Safety of endoscopic removal of self-expandable stents after treatment of benign esophageal diseases.内镜下取出治疗良性食管疾病后自膨式支架的安全性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan;77(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.001.
2
A multicenter analysis of safety and outcome of removal of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent during ERCP.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)中完全覆膜自膨式金属支架取出的安全性和结局的多中心分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.043. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
3
Endoscopic removal of self-expandable metal stents from the esophagus (with video).食管自膨式金属支架的内镜下取出(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 May 6.
4
Novel removable internally fully covered self-expanding metal esophageal stent: feasibility, technique of removal, and tissue response in humans.新型可取出的全内置式自膨式金属食管支架:人体中的可行性、取出技术及组织反应
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1374-81. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.133. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
5
Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia.经口外置支架治疗小儿食管闭锁伴良性难治性狭窄和食管穿孔
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.033. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
6
A new fully covered metal stent for the treatment of benign and malignant dysphagia: a prospective follow-up study.一种新型全覆膜金属支架治疗良性和恶性吞咽困难:前瞻性随访研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):712-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.036. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
7
Modified fully covered self-expandable metal stents with antimigration features for benign pancreatic-duct strictures in advanced chronic pancreatitis, with a focus on the safety profile and reducing migration.改良的全覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗慢性胰腺炎晚期胰管良性狭窄:关注安全性和减少迁移
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.063. Epub 2010 May 20.
8
Self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of benign upper GI leaks and perforations.自膨式金属支架治疗良性上消化道漏和穿孔。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):890-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.019.
9
Feasibility of placing a modified fully covered self-expandable metal stent above the papilla to minimize stent-induced bile duct injury in patients with refractory benign biliary strictures (with videos).经皮经肝胆道镜下改良完全覆膜自膨式金属支架置入术治疗难治性良性胆管狭窄(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May;75(5):1080-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.016. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
10
Feasibility and safety of placement of a newly designed, fully covered self-expandable metal stent for refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures: a pilot study (with video).一种新设计的全覆膜自膨式金属支架用于难治性良性胰管狭窄的放置可行性及安全性:一项试点研究(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Dec;68(6):1182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic stenting for benign upper gastrointestinal conditions: safety and efficacy profile of a fully covered double-bump antimigratory stent.用于良性上消化道疾病的内镜支架置入术:全覆膜双凸抗移位支架的安全性和有效性概况
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12069-6.
2
Safety of long-term esophageal stent use for multiple indications.长期使用食管支架治疗多种适应症的安全性。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4208-4216. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-366. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Best Practices in Esophageal, Gastroduodenal, and Colonic Stenting.
食管、胃十二指肠和结肠支架置入的最佳实践
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 7;30(Suppl 1):19-34. doi: 10.1159/000527202. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Esophageal stenting with minimally-invasive surgical intervention for delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation.采用微创外科干预进行食管支架置入术治疗延迟性自发性食管穿孔。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Mar 31;15(3):1228-1235. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1316. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
Endoscopic Management of Postoperative Esophageal and Upper GI Defects-A Narrative Review.内镜治疗术后食管和上消化道缺损-叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 10;59(1):136. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010136.
6
Helix tack suspension for esophageal stent fixation.用于食管支架固定的螺旋钉悬吊术
VideoGIE. 2022 May 13;7(6):208-210. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.02.014. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Treatment of refractory post-esophagectomy anastomotic esophageal strictures using temporary fully covered esophageal metal stenting compared to repeated bougie dilation: results of a randomized controlled trial.与反复探条扩张术相比,使用临时全覆膜食管金属支架治疗食管癌切除术后难治性吻合口食管狭窄:一项随机对照试验的结果
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E178-E185. doi: 10.1055/a-0777-1856. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Biodegradable Stents in Resistant Peptic Oesophageal Stricture: Is It the Right Way to Go?可生物降解支架治疗难治性消化性食管狭窄:这是正确的治疗方向吗?
Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec 20;11:1179552218819492. doi: 10.1177/1179552218819492. eCollection 2018.
9
Oesophageal stenting: Status quo and future challenges.食管支架置入术:现状与未来挑战。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Nov;91(1091):20170935. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170935. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Novel Endoscopic Stent for Anastomotic Leaks after Total Gastrectomy Using an Anchoring Thread and Fully Covering Thick Membrane: Prevention of Embedding and Migration.一种使用锚定线和全覆膜厚膜的新型内镜支架用于全胃切除术后吻合口漏:防止嵌入和移位
J Gastric Cancer. 2018 Mar;18(1):37-47. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e2. Epub 2018 Feb 20.