Raviv S, Nabel N
Zinman College of Physical Education, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel.
Percept Mot Skills. 1990 Feb;70(1):75-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1990.70.1.75.
Two different measures were used to test field dependence-independence, Group Hidden Figures Test and Portable Rod and Frame Test. The purpose of the study was to compare the advantages of these two measures in differentiating among adolescents who are active in individual and team sports and those who are not. 94 adolescent boys and girls were divided into three groups, as follows: 33 in individual sports, 31 in team sports, and 30 nonathletes. No correlation was found between the two measures. The Portable Rod and Frame Test was the better instrument for distinguishing among the groups. This test requires use of visual vs proprioceptive information to perceive the body's spatial orientation. The Group Hidden Figures Test requires more analytical intelligence. Since there are relationships among awareness of the body, spatial orientation, and physical activity of athletes, the Portable Rod and Frame Test seems to be more applicable to the task of distinguishing between and among athletes and nonathletes.
采用了两种不同的测量方法来测试场依存性 - 独立性,即团体隐蔽图形测验和便携式杆框测验。本研究的目的是比较这两种测量方法在区分积极参与个人运动和团队运动的青少年与不参与运动的青少年方面的优势。94名青少年男孩和女孩被分为三组,具体如下:33人参与个人运动,31人参与团队运动,30人是非运动员。两种测量方法之间未发现相关性。便携式杆框测验是区分这几组人群的更好工具。该测验需要运用视觉与本体感觉信息来感知身体的空间定向。团体隐蔽图形测验需要更多的分析智力。由于运动员的身体意识、空间定向和体育活动之间存在关联,便携式杆框测验似乎更适用于区分运动员和非运动员的任务。