Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;94(6):1190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.009. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the criterion standard in research design for establishing treatment efficacy. However, the rigorous and highly controlled conditions of RCTs can be difficult to attain when conducting research among individuals living with a confluence of disability, low socioeconomic status, and being a member of a racial/ethnic minority group, who may be more likely to have unstable life circumstances. Research on effective interventions for these groups is urgently needed, because evidence regarding approaches to reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes is lacking. In this methodologic article, we discuss the challenges and lessons learned in implementing the Lifestyle Redesign for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Spinal Cord Injury study among a highly disadvantaged population. These issues are discussed in terms of strategies to enhance recruitment, retention, and intervention relevance to the target population. Recommendations for researchers seeking to conduct RCTs among socioeconomically disadvantaged, ethnically diverse populations are provided.
随机对照试验(RCT)被认为是确立治疗效果的研究设计的标准。然而,当在残疾、低社会经济地位和少数族裔群体的个体中进行研究时,RCT 的严格和高度控制条件可能难以实现,这些个体可能更有可能面临不稳定的生活环境。迫切需要针对这些群体的有效干预措施的研究,因为缺乏关于减少健康差距和改善健康结果的方法的证据。在这篇方法学文章中,我们讨论了在高度弱势群体中实施脊髓损伤压力性溃疡预防生活方式再设计研究中遇到的挑战和经验教训。这些问题是根据增强目标人群的招募、保留和干预相关性的策略来讨论的。为寻求在社会经济处于不利地位、种族多样化的人群中进行 RCT 的研究人员提供了建议。