Bhalla M, Patel D, Shashikiran N D, Mallikarjuna R M, Nalawade T M, Reddy H K
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Inder Prastha Dental College and Hospital, Ghazizbad 46/1 Site No. IV, Industrial Area, Sahibabad, Ghazizbad, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep;30(3):201-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.105011.
This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate and compare the micro-hardness of composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using light-emitting diode (LED) and halogen curing and also to inter-compare the effect of LED and halogen curing.
The study sample comprised of 4 stainless steel plates with a thickness of 2 mm. For these stainless steel plates, holes were made to a diameter of 3 mm. The samples were divided into 4 groups of 8 each and labeled as group I, group II, group III, group IV, thus making provision for the two different modes of light exposure. In each group, the hole was restored with its respective restorative material and cured with light-curing unit according to manufacturer instructions. The results were statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney test.
It was concluded that the curing efficacy of the LED lamp was comparable to that of conventional halogen lamp, even with a 50% reduction in cure time, and resin composite (Filtek Z-250) presented the highest hardness values, whereas complete hardening of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Vitremer) was observed because of its self-curing system even after the removal of light source.
本体外研究旨在评估和比较使用发光二极管(LED)和卤素灯固化的复合树脂和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的显微硬度,并相互比较LED和卤素灯固化的效果。
研究样本包括4块厚度为2毫米的不锈钢板。在这些不锈钢板上制作直径为3毫米的孔。样本分为4组,每组8个,分别标记为I组、II组、III组、IV组,从而为两种不同的光照模式做好准备。在每组中,用各自的修复材料修复孔,并根据制造商说明用光固化装置进行固化。结果采用曼-惠特尼检验进行统计学分析。
得出的结论是,即使固化时间减少50%,LED灯的固化效果与传统卤素灯相当,树脂复合材料(Filtek Z-250)呈现出最高的硬度值,而树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)(Vitremer)由于其自固化系统,即使在移除光源后仍观察到完全固化。