Moharam Lamiaa-Mahmoud, El-Hoshy Ahmed-Zohair, Abou-Elenein Karim
Restorative and Dental Materials Research department, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Operative Dentistry department, Faculty of Oral and Dental medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Feb 1;9(2):e266-e271. doi: 10.4317/jced.53356. eCollection 2017 Feb.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the Vickers surface micro-hardness and the depth of cure of two bulk-fill resin composites and one incremental-fill resin composite.
Two Bulk-fill dental resin composites (X-tra Fil, Voco; Sonic-FillTM 2, Kerr Corporation) and an incremental-fill dental resin composite (Filtek™ Z250 XT, 3M ESPE) were used. Sixty cylindrical specimens of 4 mm thickness were prepared using split Teflon moulds. Specimens were divided into six groups (n=10) according to the type of the material used and according to the insertion technique applied (bulk or incremental). Prepared specimens were stored dry in complete darkness at 37°C for 24 hours. All specimens were tested for their Vickers surface micro-hardness, on their top and bottom surfaces. The depth of cure of the tested specimens was assessed by calculating the hardness ratio for each specimen. The Vickers surface micro-hardness and depth of cure data were analyzed for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Independent sample-t test was used to compare between two groups while One-way ANOVA was used to compare between more than two groups.
Significant difference in the Vickers surface micro-hardness and depth of cure values was demonstrated among the tested materials (<0.0001). X-tra Fil recorded the highest mean Vickers micro-hardness value (94.05±1.05). Bulk-fill dental resin composites X-tra Fil and Sonic-Fill showed 0.980±0.005 and 0.921±0.020 depth of cure values (bottom/top hardness ratio) respectively while Z250 XT recorded 0.776±0.141.
X-tra Fil showed highest Vickers surface micro-hardness values on both top and bottom surfaces, whether inserted in increments or bulk. Both bulk-fill resin composites showed higher depth of cure for both insertion techniques. Depth of cure, Vickers surface micro-hardness, bulk-fill resin composite, insertion techniques.
本研究旨在评估两种大块充填树脂复合材料和一种分层充填树脂复合材料的维氏表面显微硬度及固化深度。
使用两种大块充填牙科树脂复合材料(X-tra Fil,Voco公司;Sonic-FillTM 2,Kerr公司)和一种分层充填牙科树脂复合材料(Filtek™ Z250 XT,3M ESPE公司)。使用分体式聚四氟乙烯模具制备60个厚度为4mm的圆柱形试件。根据所用材料类型和应用的充填技术(大块充填或分层充填)将试件分为六组(n = 10)。制备好的试件在37°C完全黑暗环境中干燥保存24小时。对所有试件的顶面和底面进行维氏表面显微硬度测试。通过计算每个试件的硬度比来评估测试试件的固化深度。使用柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验和夏皮罗-威尔克检验分析维氏表面显微硬度和固化深度数据的正态性。两组之间比较使用独立样本t检验,两组以上比较使用单因素方差分析。
在测试材料之间,维氏表面显微硬度和固化深度值存在显著差异(<0.0001)。X-tra Fil记录的维氏显微硬度平均值最高(94.05±1.05)。大块充填牙科树脂复合材料X-tra Fil和Sonic-Fill的固化深度值(底面/顶面硬度比)分别为0.980±0.005和0.921±0.020,而Z250 XT记录为0.776±0.141。
无论分层充填还是大块充填,X-tra Fil在顶面和底面均显示出最高的维氏表面显微硬度值。两种大块充填树脂复合材料在两种充填技术下均显示出更高的固化深度。固化深度、维氏表面显微硬度、大块充填树脂复合材料、充填技术。