• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期 CPAP 和脉搏血氧饱和度试验中的神经发育结果。

Neurodevelopmental outcomes in the early CPAP and pulse oximetry trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California 92013, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2495-504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208506.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1208506
PMID:23268664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4140695/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous results from our trial of early treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus early surfactant treatment in infants showed no significant difference in the outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. A lower (vs. higher) target range of oxygen saturation was associated with a lower rate of severe retinopathy but higher mortality. We now report longer-term results from our prespecified hypotheses.

METHODS

Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned infants born between 24 weeks 0 days and 27 weeks 6 days of gestation to early CPAP with a limited ventilation strategy or early surfactant administration and to lower or higher target ranges of oxygen saturation (85 to 89% or 91 to 95%). The primary composite outcome for the longer-term analysis was death before assessment at 18 to 22 months or neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months of corrected age.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was determined for 1234 of 1316 enrolled infants (93.8%); 990 of the 1058 surviving infants (93.6%) were evaluated at 18 to 22 months of corrected age. Death or neurodevelopmental impairment occurred in 27.9% of the infants in the CPAP group (173 of 621 infants), versus 29.9% of those in the surfactant group (183 of 613) (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.10; P=0.38), and in 30.2% of the infants in the lower-oxygen-saturation group (185 of 612), versus 27.5% of those in the higher-oxygen-saturation group (171 of 622) (relative risk, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.32; P=0.21). Mortality was increased with the lower-oxygen-saturation target (22.1%, vs. 18.2% with the higher-oxygen-saturation target; relative risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.55; P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant differences in the composite outcome of death or neurodevelopmental impairment among extremely premature infants randomly assigned to early CPAP or early surfactant administration and to a lower or higher target range of oxygen saturation. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; SUPPORT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00233324.).

摘要

背景

我们之前进行的一项关于早期持续气道正压通气(CPAP)与早期表面活性剂治疗早产儿的试验结果显示,在死亡或支气管肺发育不良的结局方面,两种治疗方法没有显著差异。较低(而非较高)的目标血氧饱和度范围与较低的严重视网膜病变发生率相关,但与较高的死亡率相关。我们现在报告了我们预先设定的假设的长期结果。

方法

采用 2×2 析因设计,我们将 24 周零 0 天至 27 周零 6 天之间出生的婴儿随机分为早期 CPAP 联合有限通气策略组或早期表面活性剂给药组,以及较低(85%89%)或较高(91%95%)目标血氧饱和度范围组。长期分析的主要复合结局是在 18 至 22 个月时评估前死亡或 18 至 22 个月时校正年龄的神经发育障碍。

结果

1316 名入组婴儿中,有 1234 名(93.8%)确定了主要结局;在 1058 名存活婴儿中,有 990 名(93.6%)在 18 至 22 个月时校正年龄接受了评估。CPAP 组中 27.9%(621 名婴儿中的 173 名)和表面活性剂组中 29.9%(613 名婴儿中的 183 名)的婴儿发生死亡或神经发育障碍(相对风险,0.93;95%置信区间[CI],0.78 至 1.10;P=0.38),低氧饱和度组中 30.2%(612 名婴儿中的 185 名)和高氧饱和度组中 27.5%(622 名婴儿中的 171 名)的婴儿发生死亡或神经发育障碍(相对风险,1.12;95%CI,0.94 至 1.32;P=0.21)。较低的氧饱和度目标与死亡率增加相关(22.1%,与较高的氧饱和度目标相比为 18.2%;相对风险,1.25;95%CI,1.00 至 1.55;P=0.046)。

结论

我们发现,随机分配接受早期 CPAP 或早期表面活性剂治疗以及较低或较高目标血氧饱和度范围的极早产儿在死亡或神经发育障碍的复合结局方面没有显著差异。(由美国国立儿童健康与人类发育研究所和美国国家心肺血液研究所资助;SUPPORT 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00233324。)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4d/4140695/0c99297f2386/nihms433986f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4d/4140695/0c99297f2386/nihms433986f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4d/4140695/0c99297f2386/nihms433986f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Neurodevelopmental outcomes in the early CPAP and pulse oximetry trial.早期 CPAP 和脉搏血氧饱和度试验中的神经发育结果。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2495-504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208506.
2
Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants.极早产儿中早期 CPAP 与表面活性剂的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1970-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911783. Epub 2010 May 16.
3
Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants.极低出生体重儿氧饱和度目标范围。
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1959-69. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911781. Epub 2010 May 16.
4
Oxygen saturation target range for extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.极早产儿的氧饱和度目标范围:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):332-40. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3307.
5
Outcomes of Two Trials of Oxygen-Saturation Targets in Preterm Infants.两篇早产儿氧饱和度目标值试验的结局。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):749-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514212. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants.极早产儿出生时采用鼻持续气道正压通气(Nasal CPAP)或插管。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):700-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072788.
7
Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration.新生儿氧合前瞻性荟萃分析协作组:氧饱和度目标值与极早产儿死亡或残疾的相关性。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2190-2201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5725.
8
Respiratory outcomes of the surfactant positive pressure and oximetry randomized trial (SUPPORT).表面活性物质正压通气与氧饱和度监测随机试验(SUPPORT)的呼吸结局。
J Pediatr. 2014 Aug;165(2):240-249.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.054. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
9
Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.极低出生体重儿产房持续气道正压通气/呼气末正压通气:一项可行性试验
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):651-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0394.
10
Achieved oxygen saturations and retinopathy of prematurity in extreme preterms.实现极低出生体重早产儿的氧饱和度和早产儿视网膜病变。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Mar;105(2):138-144. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316464. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring cerebral hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism indices using NIR-TRS in premature infants from birth to term-equivalent age.使用近红外光谱技术(NIR-TRS)测量从出生到足月等效年龄的早产儿的脑血流动力学和氧代谢指标。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15548-x.
2
Targeted Cerebral Oxygenation Using Dedicated Treatment Versus Usual Care in Extremely Preterm Infants: Protocol for a Multicentre International Phase II Randomised Controlled Trial.针对极早产儿采用专用治疗与常规护理进行目标性脑氧合:一项多中心国际II期随机对照试验的方案
J Paediatr Child Health. 2025 Jul;61(7):1020-1029. doi: 10.1111/jpc.70066. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes.极早产儿的预后是否正在改善?贝利评估对预后的影响。
J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;161(2):222-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.057. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
2
Enrollment of extremely low birth weight infants in a clinical research study may not be representative.极早产儿纳入临床研究可能不具代表性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):480-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2121. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
3
Increased 36-week survival with high oxygen saturation target in extremely preterm infants.
A Novel Model for Simultaneous Evaluation of Hyperoxia-Mediated Brain and Lung Injury in Neonatal Rats.
一种用于同时评估新生大鼠高氧介导的脑和肺损伤的新型模型。
Cells. 2025 Mar 16;14(6):443. doi: 10.3390/cells14060443.
4
Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?将家长的声音融入极早产儿研究:我们正在做什么以及该何去何从?
J Perinatol. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02165-1.
5
A Bayesian Reanalysis of the Overall and Sex-Disaggregated Results of the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-Analysis (NeOProM).新生儿氧合前瞻性荟萃分析(NeOProM)总体及按性别分类结果的贝叶斯再分析。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;13(5):509. doi: 10.3390/antiox13050509.
6
Impact of hyperoxia on the gut during critical illnesses.危重病期间的高氧对肠道的影响。
Crit Care. 2024 Mar 1;28(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04848-9.
7
Delivery room intubation and neurodevelopment among extremely preterm infants.产房内插管与极早产儿的神经发育。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jun;95(7):1897-1902. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02993-5. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Correlation Analysis of Attention and Intelligence of Preterm Infants at Preschool Age: A Premature Cohort Study.早产儿学龄前注意力与智力的相关性分析:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;20(4):3357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043357.
9
Thresholds for surfactant use in preterm neonates: a network meta-analysis.早产儿表面活性剂使用阈值:网状荟萃分析。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Jul;108(4):333-341. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324184. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
10
Hospital and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Nano-Preterm Infants Receiving Invasive vs Noninvasive Ventilation at Birth.出生时接受有创与无创通气的纳米早产儿的医院和神经发育结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229105. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29105.
极高危早产儿采用高氧饱和度目标可提高36周生存率。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1680-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1101319.
4
Impact at age 11 years of major neonatal morbidities in children born extremely preterm.11 岁时极早产儿发生主要新生儿合并症的影响。
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):e1247-57. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0806. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
5
NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol.NeOProM:新生儿氧合前瞻性荟萃分析协作研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Jan 17;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-6.
6
Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants: a systematic review.吸入一氧化氮治疗早产儿:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):e414-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3428. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
7
Inhaled nitric oxide for respiratory failure in preterm infants.吸入一氧化氮治疗早产儿呼吸衰竭。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD000509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000509.pub4.
8
Current update on retinopathy of prematurity: screening and treatment.早产儿视网膜病变的最新进展:筛查与治疗。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Apr;23(2):173-8. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283423f35.
9
In search of the optimal oxygen saturation for extremely low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.探寻极低出生体重儿的最佳血氧饱和度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neonatology. 2011;100(1):1-8. doi: 10.1159/000322001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
10
Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment.SUPPORT 试验中的产前同意:挑战、成本和有代表性的入组。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e215-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3353. Epub 2010 Jun 29.