Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):369-77. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1725-0. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
The number of candidates for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is steadily increasing, while the average patient age is decreasing for primary THA. The rise in THA is mainly due to excellent clinical outcomes and the extended longevity of modern implants. Short stem arthroplasties with predominantly metaphyseal fixation such as the Metha® stem are suggested for young patients. It is hypothesised that the more physiological load transfer of these devices reduces stress shielding, which in turn may reduce the risk of aseptic loosening. However, patients with femoral deformities often require a deviation of the resection height. To this end, our aim was to evaluate how resection height influences strain patterns in order to characterise possible limits for short stem implantation.
Biomechanical testing using ten strain gauges on synthetic bone illustrated the strain patterns of three different resection heights (0, +5 and +10 mm) for the Metha stem.
The greatest differences in strains were displayed at the "high" (most proximal) resection height (+10 mm) when compared to the non-implanted strain pattern. At the medial calcar, the strain was 143% for +10 mm, 96% for +5 mm and 94% for 0 mm. Overall, discrepancies were less for deeper resections.
The deeper the resection, the more similar the strain patterns are when compared to a non-implanted synthetic bone. Changes in strain patterns are induced by variation in the varus/valgus positioning of the implant and by different offsets.
全髋关节置换术(THA)的候选人数稳步增加,而初次 THA 的平均患者年龄却在下降。THA 的增加主要是由于出色的临床结果和现代植入物的使用寿命延长。对于年轻患者,建议使用主要通过骨干固定的短柄关节置换,如 Metha® 柄。人们假设这些器械更符合生理的负荷传递减少了应力遮挡,从而降低了无菌性松动的风险。然而,患有股骨畸形的患者通常需要改变切除高度。为此,我们的目的是评估切除高度如何影响应变模式,以确定短柄植入的可能极限。
使用十个应变计在合成骨上进行生物力学测试,说明了 Metha 柄的三种不同切除高度(0、+5 和+10mm)的应变模式。
与未植入的应变模式相比,在“高”(最靠近近端)切除高度(+10mm)时显示出最大的应变差异。在内侧骨皮质处,对于+10mm、+5mm 和 0mm,应变分别为 143%、96%和 94%。总体而言,较深的切除差异较小。
切除越深,与未植入的合成骨相比,应变模式越相似。应变模式的变化是由植入物的内翻/外翻位置变化和不同的偏移引起的。