Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Jul 1;131(1-2):162-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
Severe mental illness is often exclusionary criteria for studies examining factors that influence addiction treatment outcome. Therefore, little is known about predictors of treatment response of individuals receiving psychosocial treatments for addictions who suffer from co-occurring severe mental illness.
The impact of demographic, substance abuse severity, psychiatric severity, and service utilization variables on in-treatment performance (i.e., longest duration of abstinence) in a 12-week contingency management (CM) intervention for stimulant abuse in 96 severely mentally ill adults was investigated. A 4-step linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of in-treatment abstinence.
This model accounted for 37.4% of variance in the longest duration of abstinence outcome. Lower levels of stimulant use (i.e., stimulant-negative urine test) and psychiatric severity (i.e., lower levels of psychiatric distress), as well as higher rates of outpatient treatment utilization at study entry were independently associated with longer duration of drug abstinence.
These data suggest that individuals with low levels of stimulant use and psychiatric severity, as well as those actively engaged in services are most likely to succeed in a typical CM intervention. For others, modifications to CM interventions, such as increasing the value of reinforcement or adding CM to evidence based psychiatric interventions may improve treatment outcomes.
严重的精神疾病通常是影响成瘾治疗结果的因素研究的排除标准。因此,对于同时患有严重精神疾病并接受心理社会治疗的成瘾患者,其治疗反应的预测因素知之甚少。
本研究调查了 96 名严重精神疾病成年人接受为期 12 周的兴奋剂滥用行为的强化管理(CM)干预治疗中,人口统计学、物质滥用严重程度、精神疾病严重程度和服务利用变量对治疗期间表现(即最长禁欲时间)的影响。采用 4 步线性回归来确定治疗期间禁欲的独立预测因子。
该模型解释了最长禁欲时间结果中 37.4%的差异。较低的兴奋剂使用水平(即兴奋剂阴性尿检)和精神疾病严重程度(即较低的精神困扰水平),以及较高的研究初始时门诊治疗利用率与较长的药物禁欲时间独立相关。
这些数据表明,兴奋剂使用和精神疾病严重程度较低,以及积极参与服务的个体最有可能在典型的 CM 干预中取得成功。对于其他人,CM 干预措施的修改,例如增加强化的价值或在基于证据的精神科干预措施中添加 CM,可能会改善治疗结果。