Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, QE II Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jun-Jul;34(6):1175-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3376. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
For pronouncing brain death, unlike CTP, the 2-phase CTA gives no functional information and is limited by inadvertent delay of the second acquisition, which may give false-negative results. The purpose of our study was to compare CTP and CTA derived from the CTP data with the Dupas and Frampas criteria for confirmation of brain death. A retrospective review of CTP in 11 consecutive patients for confirmation of brain death showed a sensitivity of 72.7% for 7- and 4-point scores, 81.8% for opacification of the ICV, and 100% for CTP scores in the brain stem. CTA obtained from the CTP data showed similar sensitivity in the diagnosis of brain death. This protocol also reduces the iodinated contrast dose and is less operator-dependent. The addition of the functional tools of CTP increased the sensitivity of CTA in the confirmation of brain death.
对于脑死亡的诊断,与 CTP 不同,2 期 CTA 不能提供功能信息,并且容易受到第二次采集延迟的影响,从而可能导致假阴性结果。我们的研究目的是比较 CTP 和 CTA 与 Dupas 和 Frampas 标准对脑死亡的确认,对 11 例连续 CTP 用于确认脑死亡的回顾性分析显示,7 分和 4 分评分的敏感性分别为 72.7%和 81.8%,脑室内混浊的敏感性为 100%,脑干 CTP 评分的敏感性为 100%。从 CTP 数据中获得的 CTA 在脑死亡的诊断中具有相似的敏感性。该方案还减少了碘造影剂的剂量,并且对操作人员的依赖性更小。CTP 的功能工具的增加提高了 CTA 在脑死亡确认中的敏感性。