Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University, Uchimaru 19-1, Morioka, Iwate 020-8505, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;43(2):193-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys213. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Although cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy was demonstrated to improve the survival among patients with locally advanced bladder cancer, its severe adverse events, including nephrotoxicity, are critical issues. We investigated the safety and activity of carboplatin, a mild nephrotoxic agent, combined with gemcitabine as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer.
We retrospectively evaluated 68 patients with locally advanced bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (n = 34) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (n = 34) followed by cystectomy at our institute. The adverse events, chemotherapy delivery profile, rate of down-stage and recurrence-free survival were assessed for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and carboplatin.
The mean cycles of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and gemcitabine and carboplatin, were 2.5 and 2.7, respectively. The hematologic adverse events of Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were 15, 18 and 0%, respectively. The occurrences for gemcitabine and carboplatin were 53, 21 and 50%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were nausea and vomiting in 24%, and were not observed for gemcitabine and carboplatin. The lowest median estimated glomerular filtration rate during methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin and gemcitabine and carboplatin was 55.8 and 70.6 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (P = 0.002). The rate of down-stage to pT1 or less was 59% for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and 53% for gemcitabine and carboplatin (P = 0.624). The recurrence-free survival of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and gemcitabine and carboplatin, at 36 months from the diagnosis was 79 and 75%, respectively (P = 0.85).
Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin showed less non-hematologic toxicity than methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, and especially less nephrotoxicity was demonstrated for gemcitabine and carboplatin. Although observed during the short term, the recurrence-free survival for gemcitabine and carboplatin was comparable to that for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin.
顺铂为基础的新辅助化疗后膀胱切除术已被证实可提高局部晚期膀胱癌患者的生存率,但顺铂的严重不良反应,包括肾毒性,是一个关键问题。我们研究了卡铂联合吉西他滨作为新辅助化疗在局部晚期膀胱癌患者中的安全性和疗效,与甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂相比。
我们回顾性评估了在我院接受新辅助甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂(n = 34)或吉西他滨和卡铂(n = 34)治疗后接受膀胱切除术的 68 例局部晚期膀胱癌患者。评估了甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂与吉西他滨和卡铂相比的不良事件、化疗输送情况、降期率和无复发生存率。
甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂和吉西他滨与卡铂的平均周期分别为 2.5 和 2.7。甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂的 3 或 4 级中性粒细胞减少、贫血和血小板减少的血液学不良反应分别为 15%、18%和 0%。吉西他滨和卡铂的发生率分别为 53%、21%和 50%。甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂的 3 或 4 级非血液学毒性为 24%的恶心和呕吐,而吉西他滨和卡铂则没有观察到。甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂和吉西他滨与卡铂的最低中位估计肾小球滤过率分别为 55.8 和 70.6 ml/min/1.73 m²(P = 0.002)。甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂的降期至 pT1 或更低的比例为 59%,吉西他滨和卡铂为 53%(P = 0.624)。从诊断开始 36 个月时,甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂与吉西他滨和卡铂的无复发生存率分别为 79%和 75%(P = 0.85)。
新辅助吉西他滨和卡铂的非血液学毒性低于甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂,尤其是吉西他滨和卡铂的肾毒性较低。尽管在短期内观察到,但吉西他滨和卡铂的无复发生存率与甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂相当。