Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, Otoneurology Discipline, Rua Pedro de Toledo 947, Vila Clementino, São Paulo 04025-002, Brazil.
Trials. 2012 Dec 31;13:246. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-246.
There are several protocols designed to treat vestibular disorders that focus on habituation, substitution, adaptation, and compensation exercises. However, protocols that contemplate not only vestibular stimulation but also other components that are essential to the body balance control in older people are rare. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two vestibular rehabilitation protocols (conventional versus multimodal) on the functional capacity and body balance control of older people with chronic dizziness due to vestibular disorders.
METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial with a 3 months follow-up period will be performed. The sample will be composed of older individuals with a clinical diagnosis of chronic dizziness resulting from vestibular disorders. The subjects will be evaluated at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up. Primary outcomes will be determined in accordance with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (functional capacity) and the Dynamic Gait Index (body balance). Secondary outcomes include dizziness features, functional records, body balance control tests, and psychological information. The older individuals (minimum sample n = 68) will be randomized to either the conventional or multimodal Cawthorne&Cooksey protocols. The protocols will be performed during individual 50-minute sessions, twice a week, for 2 months (a total of 16 sessions). The outcomes of both protocols will be compared according to the intention-to-treat analysis.
Vestibular rehabilitation through the Cawthorne&Cooksey protocol has already proved to be effective. However, the addition of other components related to body balance control has been proposed to improve the rehabilitation of older people with chronic dizziness from vestibular disorders.
ACTRN12610000018011.
有几种旨在治疗前庭障碍的方案,侧重于习惯化、替代、适应和代偿运动。然而,很少有方案不仅考虑到前庭刺激,还考虑到对老年人身体平衡控制至关重要的其他组成部分。本研究旨在比较两种前庭康复方案(常规与多模式)对因前庭障碍导致慢性头晕的老年人的功能能力和身体平衡控制的疗效。
方法/设计:这将是一项为期 3 个月随访期的随机、单盲、对照临床试验。样本由临床诊断为因前庭障碍导致慢性头晕的老年人组成。受试者将在基线、治疗后和随访时进行评估。主要结局将根据头晕障碍量表(功能能力)和动态步态指数(身体平衡)来确定。次要结局包括头晕特征、功能记录、身体平衡控制测试和心理信息。老年人(最小样本 n = 68)将随机分为常规或多模式 Cawthorne&Cooksey 方案组。方案将在每周两次、每次 50 分钟的个体疗程中进行,为期 2 个月(共 16 次)。将根据意向治疗分析比较两种方案的结果。
通过 Cawthorne&Cooksey 方案进行的前庭康复已被证明是有效的。然而,已经提出增加与身体平衡控制相关的其他组成部分,以改善因前庭障碍导致慢性头晕的老年人的康复。
ACTRN12610000018011。