• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前磁共振成像测量的盂唇大小不能预测初次髋关节镜检查患者盂唇重建的必要性。

Labral size measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging not predictive of the need for labral reconstruction in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.

作者信息

Peszek Adam, Alder Catherine C, Jamar Kyle, Wait Trevor J, Wipf Caleb J, Keeter Carson L, Mayer Stephanie W, Ho Charles P, Genuario James W

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Court Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion, 4th Floor, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Department of Radiology-Diagnostics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12401 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Dec 10;12(1):20-26. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae043. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnae043
PMID:40331069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12051866/
Abstract

Preoperative radiographic measurements may help predict which patients with hip labral tears ultimately undergo repair versus primary reconstruction. This study investigated if radiographic parameters: (i) preoperatively predict labral repair versus reconstruction and (ii) correlate with T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping values of the labrum. This retrospective comparative study included patients aged 14-50 years who underwent labral repair or reconstruction at a single institution over a 2-year period. Patients with prior open or arthroscopic hip surgery or who had inadequate preoperative computed tomography (CT) and MRI imaging were excluded. Labral size was measured at multiple positions on preoperative MRI images. A blinded reviewer used three-dimensional CT analysis to record lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular version, Tonnis angle, acetabular coverage, alpha angle, femoral torsion, and neck-shaft angle (FNSA). T2 MRI mapping values of the labrum were obtained via sequencing analyses on each patient's optimal sagittal cut. Univariate mixed linear models were used to identify associations between each radiographic measurement and decision to repair or reconstruct the labrum. Fifty-two operations were included. Labral size had no predictive effect on undergoing labral reconstruction versus repair. Likelihood for undergoing labral reconstruction was associated with LCEA ( = .003) and Tonnis angle ( = .034). There was an association ( < .05) between labral T2 mapping values and all radiographic parameters except for FNSA and combined version. Labral size was not associated with whether patients underwent labral reconstruction or repair. The data showed an association between labrum T2 mapping values and nearly all radiographic parameters.

摘要

术前影像学测量可能有助于预测哪些髋关节盂唇撕裂患者最终会接受修复手术还是初次重建手术。本研究调查了影像学参数:(i)术前能否预测盂唇修复与重建手术,以及(ii)是否与盂唇的T2磁共振成像(MRI)映射值相关。这项回顾性比较研究纳入了年龄在14至50岁之间、在两年内于单一机构接受盂唇修复或重建手术的患者。排除了既往有开放性或关节镜髋关节手术史或术前计算机断层扫描(CT)和MRI成像不充分的患者。在术前MRI图像的多个位置测量盂唇大小。一位不知情的评估者使用三维CT分析记录外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)、髋臼旋转、托尼斯角、髋臼覆盖度、α角、股骨扭转和颈干角(FNSA)。通过对每位患者最佳矢状切面的序列分析获得盂唇的T2 MRI映射值。使用单变量混合线性模型确定每个影像学测量值与盂唇修复或重建决策之间的关联。共纳入52例手术。盂唇大小对接受盂唇重建还是修复没有预测作用。接受盂唇重建的可能性与LCEA(=0.003)和托尼斯角(=0.034)相关。除FNSA和联合旋转外,盂唇T2映射值与所有影像学参数之间存在关联(<0.05)。盂唇大小与患者是否接受盂唇重建或修复无关。数据显示盂唇T2映射值与几乎所有影像学参数之间存在关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25aa/12051866/787fefd75904/hnae043f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25aa/12051866/1e698affc263/hnae043f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25aa/12051866/787fefd75904/hnae043f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25aa/12051866/1e698affc263/hnae043f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25aa/12051866/787fefd75904/hnae043f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Labral size measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging not predictive of the need for labral reconstruction in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.术前磁共振成像测量的盂唇大小不能预测初次髋关节镜检查患者盂唇重建的必要性。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Dec 10;12(1):20-26. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae043. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Preoperative quantitative imaging use in predicting intraoperative decision for hip labral repair versus reconstruction.术前定量成像在预测髋关节盂唇修复与重建术中决策的应用。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Nov 15;11(4):287-297. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae035. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Midterm Follow-Up and Assessment of Cartilage Thickness by Arthro-Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Arthroscopic Cam Resection, Labral Repair, and Rim Trimming Without Labral Detachment.关节镜下凸轮切除术、盂唇修复和边缘修整而不游离盂唇后,关节磁共振成像的中期随访和软骨厚度评估。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.012. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
4
Radiographic and Demographic Factors Can Predict the Need for Primary Labral Reconstruction in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Predictive Model Using 1398 Hips.影像学和人口统计学因素可预测髋关节镜手术中原发性盂唇重建的需求:使用 1398 髋的预测模型。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):173-180. doi: 10.1177/0363546519887749.
5
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement.在初次髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症时,预测不可挽救的盂唇撕裂的临床和影像学指标。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2029-2037. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856018. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Labral injury: radiographic predictors at the time of hip arthroscopy.盂唇损伤:髋关节镜检查时的影像学预测指标
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
7
Decreased Hip Labral Width Measured via Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Inferior Outcomes for Arthroscopic Labral Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement.术前磁共振成像测量的髋关节盂唇宽度减小与髋关节镜下盂唇修复治疗股骨髋臼撞击症的不良结局相关。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?髋臼周围截骨术可改善外侧中心边缘角在 18° 和 25° 之间的患者的疼痛和功能,但这些髋关节真的属于边缘性发育不良吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000516.
9
In Revision Hip Arthroscopy, Labral Reconstruction Can Address a Deficient Labrum, but Labral Repair Retains Its Role for the Reparable Labrum: A Matched Control Study.在 Revision Hip Arthroscopy 中,盂唇重建可以解决有缺陷的盂唇问题,但盂唇修复对于可修复的盂唇仍有其作用:一项匹配对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3437-3445. doi: 10.1177/0363546518809063. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
10
The Everted Acetabular Labrum: Patho-anatomy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Findings of a Native Variant.反转髋臼唇:一种固有变异的病理解剖、磁共振成像和关节镜检查结果。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jan;38(1):72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.038. Epub 2021 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Intraoperative Labral Width at the 9-O'clock and 12-O'clock Positions in Primary Hip Arthroscopy.术前磁共振成像可预测初次髋关节镜检查中9点和12点位的术中盂唇宽度。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 11;4(4):e1331-e1337. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.017. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Repair versus Debridement for Acetabular Labral Tears-A Systematic Review.髋臼唇盂撕裂的修复与清创术——一项系统评价
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 18;3(5):e1569-e1576. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.008. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction: a review.
关节镜下髋臼盂唇重建:综述
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 Apr 21;7(4):611-620. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnab003. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
3-T T2 mapping magnetic resonance imaging for biochemical assessment of normal and damaged glenoid cartilage: a prospective arthroscopy-controlled study.3-T T2 mapping 磁共振成像在评估正常和损伤肩盂软骨生物化学特性中的应用:一项前瞻性关节镜对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 1;10(1):14396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71311-4.
5
Can preoperative magnetic resonance arthrography accurately predict intraoperative hip labral thickness?术前磁共振关节造影能否准确预测术中髋关节盂唇厚度?
J Orthop. 2020 Jan 21;20:131-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.024. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
6
Radiographic and Demographic Factors Can Predict the Need for Primary Labral Reconstruction in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Predictive Model Using 1398 Hips.影像学和人口统计学因素可预测髋关节镜手术中原发性盂唇重建的需求:使用 1398 髋的预测模型。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):173-180. doi: 10.1177/0363546519887749.
7
Validity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Hip Labral Width Compared With Intraoperative Assessment.髋关节盂唇宽度的磁共振成像测量与术中评估的比较的有效性。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):751-758. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.027. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Indications and Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: A Systematic Review.髋关节镜下盂唇重建的适应证和疗效:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):2175-2186. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.031.
9
Predictors of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.股骨髋臼撞击症髋关节镜手术后结果的预测因素:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):2325967119848982. doi: 10.1177/2325967119848982. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement.在初次髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症时,预测不可挽救的盂唇撕裂的临床和影像学指标。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2029-2037. doi: 10.1177/0363546519856018. Epub 2019 Jun 24.