• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CABG again outshines stenting for some patients with coronary artery blockage.

作者信息

Mitka Mike

出版信息

JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):17-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.97092.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.97092
PMID:23280199
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
CABG again outshines stenting for some patients with coronary artery blockage.对于一些冠状动脉阻塞患者，冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）再次优于支架植入术。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 2;309(1):17-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.97092.
2
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对多支血管病变患者长期死亡率和发病率的影响：动脉搭桥和支架时代随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):223-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844.
3
Outcomes with coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with diabetes mellitus: can newer generation drug-eluting stents bridge the gap?糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较：新一代药物洗脱支架能否缩小差距？
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):518-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001346. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
4
[Left main coronary stenting is safe and effective and is a valuable alternative to coronary artery bypass graft surgery].
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2009 Feb;10(2):113-7; discussion 117.
5
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains the standard of care for patients with diabetes.冠状动脉旁路移植术仍然是糖尿病患者的标准治疗方法。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Summer;25(2):97-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2013.07.007.
6
Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials on long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for multivessel coronary artery disease.四项关于多支冠状动脉疾病冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入支架置入术长期预后的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 May 1;101(9):1259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.12.026. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
7
The FREEDOM trial: a definitive answer to coronary artery bypass grafting or stents in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease.FREEDOM试验：糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉搭桥术或支架置入术的确切答案。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Dec;44(6):978-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt450. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
8
Are drug-eluting stents superior to bare metal stents when compared to coronary artery bypass surgery? Show me the data.与冠状动脉搭桥手术相比，药物洗脱支架是否优于裸金属支架？给我看看数据。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;14(2):90-2. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
9
One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.冠状动脉旁路移植术与多系统疾病多支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年结局：来自随机临床试验个体患者数据的荟萃分析
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.049.
10
The FREEDOM trial: in appropriate patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG beats PCI.FREEDOM 试验：在患有糖尿病和多支冠状动脉疾病的合适患者中，CABG 优于 PCI。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2013 Aug;80(8):515-23. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.80a.13030.