Suppr超能文献

法国低危孕妇的产科干预措施:产科病房特征有影响吗?

Obstetric interventions for low-risk pregnant women in France: do maternity unit characteristics make a difference?

机构信息

The Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal Health and Women’s and Children’s Health, INSERM, Paris, France.

出版信息

Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):183-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00547.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In many countries the closure of small maternity units has raised concerns about how the concentration of low-risk pregnancies in large specialized units might affect the management of childbirth. We aimed to assess the role of maternity unit characteristics on obstetric intervention rates among low-risk women in France.

METHODS

Data on low-risk deliveries came from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey of a representative sample of births (n = 9,530). The maternity unit characteristics studied were size, level of care, and private or public status; the interventions included induction of labor; cesarean section; operative vaginal delivery (forceps, spatulas or vacuum); and episiotomy. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were adjusted for maternal confounding factors, gestational age, and infant birthweight.

RESULTS

The rates of induction, cesarean section, operative delivery, and episiotomy in this low-risk population were 23.9 percent, 10.1 percent, 15.2 percent, and 19.6 percent, respectively, and 52.0 percent of deliveries included at least one of them. Unit size was unrelated to any intervention except operative delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.47 (95% CI, 1.10-1.96) for units with >3,000 deliveries per year vs units with <1,000). The rate of every intervention was higher in private units, and the aOR for any intervention was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.59-2.08). After adjustment for maternal characteristics and facility size and status, significant variations in the use of interventions remained between units, especially for episiotomies. Results for level of care were similar to those for unit size.

CONCLUSIONS

The concentration of births in large maternity units in France is not associated with higher rates of interventions for low-risk births. The situation in private units could be explained by differences in the organization of care. Additional research should explore the differences in practices between maternity units with similar characteristics.

摘要

背景

在许多国家,小型妇产单位的关闭引起了人们的关注,即大量低风险妊娠集中在大型专业单位可能会如何影响分娩管理。我们旨在评估法国低风险妇女产科干预率与妇产单位特征的关系。

方法

低风险分娩数据来自于 2010 年法国全国围产期调查的一个代表性样本的分娩(n=9530)。研究的妇产单位特征包括规模、护理水平以及公私性质;干预措施包括引产、剖宫产、阴道分娩(产钳、刮板或真空)和会阴切开术。多水平逻辑回归分析调整了产妇混杂因素、胎龄和婴儿出生体重。

结果

在这个低风险人群中,诱导分娩、剖宫产、阴道分娩和会阴切开术的发生率分别为 23.9%、10.1%、15.2%和 19.6%,52.0%的分娩至少包括其中一种。单位规模与任何干预措施无关,除了阴道分娩(调整后的优势比[aOR]=1.47(95%可信区间,1.10-1.96),每年分娩量>3000 例的单位与<1000 例的单位相比)。私立单位的每种干预措施发生率较高,任何干预措施的 aOR 为 1.82(95%可信区间,1.59-2.08)。在调整了产妇特征和设施规模和性质后,干预措施的使用仍存在单位间的显著差异,尤其是会阴切开术。护理水平的结果与单位规模的结果相似。

结论

法国大型妇产单位集中分娩与低风险分娩的干预率升高无关。私立单位的情况可以用护理组织的差异来解释。进一步的研究应探讨具有相似特征的妇产单位之间实践的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验