Asheim Andreas, Nilsen Sara Marie, Opdahl Signe, Risnes Kari, Balstad Magnussen Elisabeth, Carlsen Fredrik, Davies Neil Martin, Bjørngaard Johan Håkon
From the Center for Health Care Improvement, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Epidemiology. 2025 May 1;36(3):425-435. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001840. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
Hospital regionalization involves balancing hospital volume and travel time. We investigated how hospital volume and travel time affect perinatal mortality and the risk of delivery in transit using three different study designs.
This nationwide cohort study used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (1999-2016) and Statistics Norway. We compared estimates across three designs: (1) Observed confounder adjustment: Comparing women giving birth at hospitals of different sizes and travel times (1,066,332 births), (2) Sibling comparison: Comparing women who moved between hospital catchment areas between births (203,464 births), and (3) Neighbor comparison: comparing women living in neighboring municipalities, but in different hospital catchment areas (460,776 births).
The study population included 5080 (0.48%) perinatal deaths and 7063 deliveries in transit (0.66%). For hospitals with 2000 compared with 500 births/year, observed confounder adjustment showed 1.81 times higher perinatal mortality (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 2.73). However, sibling and neighbor comparisons showed a factor of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.43, 0.97) and 0.61% (95% CI: 0.43, 0.88) lower perinatal mortality, respectively. Increased travel time was strongly associated with higher perinatal mortality using observed confounder adjustment, but this was not supported by the other designs. Longer travel time was consistently linked to an increased risk of delivery in transit.
Perinatal mortality was higher in high-volume hospitals when adjusting for observed confounders. However, triangulating inferences from the other designs suggested the opposite, estimating that observed confounder control was insufficient. This supports the idea that access to higher-volume hospitals could improve perinatal outcomes at the population level.
医院区域化涉及平衡医院工作量和出行时间。我们使用三种不同的研究设计,调查了医院工作量和出行时间如何影响围产期死亡率以及途中分娩风险。
这项全国性队列研究使用了挪威医疗出生登记处(1999 - 2016年)和挪威统计局的数据。我们比较了三种设计的估计结果:(1)观察到的混杂因素调整:比较在不同规模和出行时间的医院分娩的女性(1,066,332例分娩),(2)兄弟姐妹比较:比较在两次分娩之间在医院服务区域之间移动的女性(203,464例分娩),以及(3)邻居比较:比较居住在相邻自治市但在不同医院服务区域的女性(460,776例分娩)。
研究人群包括5080例(0.48%)围产期死亡和7063例途中分娩(0.66%)。对于每年有2000例与500例分娩的医院,观察到的混杂因素调整显示围产期死亡率高1.81倍(95%置信区间[CI]:1.21, 2.73)。然而,兄弟姐妹比较和邻居比较分别显示围产期死亡率低0.64倍(95% CI:0.43, 0.97)和0.61%(95% CI:0.43, 0.88)。使用观察到的混杂因素调整,出行时间增加与围产期死亡率升高密切相关,但其他设计不支持这一点。出行时间延长始终与途中分娩风险增加相关。
在调整观察到的混杂因素时,高工作量医院的围产期死亡率较高。然而,从其他设计进行三角推断则表明相反情况,估计观察到的混杂因素控制不足。这支持了这样一种观点,即前往高工作量医院就医可能会在人群层面改善围产期结局。