Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2924-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2761-1.
Rotational kinematics has become an important consideration after ACL reconstruction because of its possible influence on knee degeneration. However, it remains unknown whether ACL reconstruction can restore both rotational kinematics and normal joint contact patterns, especially during functional activities.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether knee kinematics (tibial anterior translation and axial rotation) and joint contact mechanics (tibiofemoral sliding distance) would be restored by double-bundle (DB) or single-bundle (SB) reconstruction.
We retrospectively studied 17 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by the SB (n = 7) or DB (n = 10) procedure. We used dynamic stereo x-ray to capture biplane radiographic images of the knee during downhill treadmill running. Tibial anterior translation, axial rotation, and joint sliding distance in the medial and lateral compartments were compared between reconstructed and contralateral knees in both SB and DB groups.
We observed reduced anterior tibial translation and increased knee rotation in the reconstructed knees compared to the contralateral knees in both SB and DB groups. The mean joint sliding distance on the medial compartment was larger in the reconstructed knees than in the contralateral knees for both the SB group (9.5 ± 3.9 mm versus 7.5 ± 4.3 mm) and the DB group (11.1 ± 1.3 mm versus 7.9 ± 3.8 mm).
Neither ACL reconstruction procedure restored normal knee kinematics or medial joint sliding.
Further study is necessary to understand the clinical significance of abnormal joint contact, identify the responsible mechanisms, and optimize reconstruction procedures for restoring normal joint mechanics after ACL injury.
由于其对膝关节退变的可能影响,ACL 重建后旋转运动学已成为一个重要的考虑因素。然而,ACL 重建是否可以恢复旋转运动学和正常的关节接触模式仍不清楚,尤其是在功能活动中。
问题/目的:我们想知道双束(DB)或单束(SB)重建是否可以恢复膝关节运动学(胫骨前向平移和轴向旋转)和关节接触力学(胫股滑动距离)。
我们回顾性研究了 17 例接受 ACL 重建的患者,其中 SB 组 7 例,DB 组 10 例。我们使用动态立体 X 射线在下山跑步机跑步过程中捕捉膝关节的双平面射线照相图像。在 SB 和 DB 两组中,比较了重建侧和对侧膝关节的胫骨前向平移、轴向旋转和内外侧间室的关节滑动距离。
我们观察到,与 SB 和 DB 两组的对侧膝关节相比,重建膝关节的胫骨前向平移减小,膝关节旋转增加。与 SB 组(9.5 ± 3.9 mm 比 7.5 ± 4.3 mm)和 DB 组(11.1 ± 1.3 mm 比 7.9 ± 3.8 mm)相比,重建膝关节的内侧间室关节滑动距离较大。
两种 ACL 重建方法均未恢复正常的膝关节运动学或内侧关节滑动。
需要进一步研究以了解异常关节接触的临床意义,确定责任机制,并优化 ACL 损伤后恢复正常关节力学的重建程序。