Suppr超能文献

客观评估音乐能力:音乐感知技能特征的构建与验证。

Assessing musical abilities objectively: construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052508. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Abstract

A common approach for determining musical competence is to rely on information about individuals' extent of musical training, but relying on musicianship status fails to identify musically untrained individuals with musical skill, as well as those who, despite extensive musical training, may not be as skilled. To counteract this limitation, we developed a new test battery (Profile of Music Perception Skills; PROMS) that measures perceptual musical skills across multiple domains: tonal (melody, pitch), qualitative (timbre, tuning), temporal (rhythm, rhythm-to-melody, accent, tempo), and dynamic (loudness). The PROMS has satisfactory psychometric properties for the composite score (internal consistency and test-retest r>.85) and fair to good coefficients for the individual subtests (.56 to.85). Convergent validity was established with the relevant dimensions of Gordon's Advanced Measures of Music Audiation and Musical Aptitude Profile (melody, rhythm, tempo), the Musical Ear Test (rhythm), and sample instrumental sounds (timbre). Criterion validity was evidenced by consistently sizeable and significant relationships between test performance and external musical proficiency indicators in all three studies (.38 to.62, p<.05 to p<.01). An absence of correlations between test scores and a nonmusical auditory discrimination task supports the battery's discriminant validity (-.05, ns). The interrelationships among the various subtests could be accounted for by two higher order factors, sequential and sensory music processing. A brief version of the full PROMS is introduced as a time-efficient approximation of the full version of the battery.

摘要

确定音乐能力的一种常见方法是依赖于个体音乐训练程度的信息,但依赖于音乐技能水平并不能识别没有受过音乐训练但具有音乐技能的个体,也不能识别那些尽管接受了广泛的音乐训练但可能不那么熟练的个体。为了克服这一局限性,我们开发了一种新的测试组合(音乐感知技能概况;PROMS),它可以衡量多个领域的感知音乐技能:音高(旋律、音高)、音色(音色、音准)、时间(节奏、节奏与旋律、重音、速度)和力度(响度)。PROMS 对综合得分具有令人满意的心理测量学特性(内部一致性和重测信度>.85),对个别子测试的系数为中等至良好(.56 至.85)。与 Gordon 的高级音乐听力和音乐能力概况的相关维度(旋律、节奏、速度)、音乐听力测试(节奏)和样本乐器声音(音色)建立了会聚效度。与所有三项研究中的外部音乐熟练程度指标之间存在一致且显著的关系,证明了效标效度(.38 至.62,p<.05 至 p<.01)。测试成绩与非音乐听觉辨别任务之间没有相关性支持了该测试组合的辨别效度(-.05,ns)。各项子测试之间的相互关系可以由两个更高阶的因素来解释,即顺序和感觉音乐处理。完整 PROMS 的简短版本被引入,作为电池完整版本的时间效率近似值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4361/3532219/2cb5ac49ab06/pone.0052508.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验