Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jan 3;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-2.
This study aimed to compare the levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior in children attending Montessori preschools with those attending traditional preschools.
The participants in this study were preschool children aged 4 years old who were enrolled in Montessori and traditional preschools. The preschool children wore ActiGraph accelerometers. Accelerometers were initialized using 15-second intervals and sedentary behavior was defined as <200 counts/15-second. The accelerometry data were summarized into the average minutes per hour spent in sedentary behavior during the in-school, the after-school, and the total-day period. Mixed linear regression models were used to determine differences in the average time spent in sedentary behavior between children attending traditional and Montessori preschools, after adjusting for selected potential correlates of preschoolers' sedentary behavior.
Children attending Montessori preschools spent less time in sedentary behavior than those attending traditional preschools during the in-school (44.4. min/hr vs. 47.1 min/hr, P = 0.03), after-school (42.8. min/hr vs. 44.7 min/hr, P = 0.04), and total-day (43.7 min/hr vs. 45.5 min/hr, P = 0. 009) periods. School type (Montessori or traditional), preschool setting (private or public), socio-demographic factors (age, gender, and socioeconomic status) were found to be significant predictors of preschoolers' sedentary behavior.
Levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior were significantly lower among children attending Montessori preschools compared to children attending traditional preschools. Future research should examine the specific characteristics of Montessori preschools that predict the lower levels of sedentary behavior among children attending these preschools compared to children attending traditional preschools.
本研究旨在比较参加蒙台梭利幼儿园和传统幼儿园的儿童的客观测量的久坐行为水平。
本研究的参与者为 4 岁的学龄前儿童,他们分别入读蒙台梭利幼儿园和传统幼儿园。幼儿园儿童佩戴 ActiGraph 加速度计。加速度计使用 15 秒间隔初始化,久坐行为定义为<200 计数/15 秒。将加速度计数据总结为在学校期间、放学后和全天期间,每小时平均久坐分钟数。使用混合线性回归模型,在调整了学龄前儿童久坐行为的一些潜在相关因素后,确定了上传统幼儿园和蒙台梭利幼儿园的儿童在平均久坐时间上的差异。
与上传统幼儿园的儿童相比,上蒙台梭利幼儿园的儿童在学校期间(44.4. min/hr 与 47.1 min/hr,P = 0.03)、放学后(42.8. min/hr 与 44.7 min/hr,P = 0.04)和全天(43.7 min/hr 与 45.5 min/hr,P = 0.009)期间的久坐时间更少。学校类型(蒙台梭利或传统)、幼儿园设置(私立或公立)、社会人口因素(年龄、性别和社会经济地位)被发现是预测学龄前儿童久坐行为的重要因素。
与上传统幼儿园的儿童相比,上蒙台梭利幼儿园的儿童的客观测量的久坐行为水平明显更低。未来的研究应该研究蒙台梭利幼儿园的具体特征,这些特征预测了上这些幼儿园的儿童比上传统幼儿园的儿童的久坐行为水平更低。