Institute for Healthcare Studies and Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N Lake Shore Dr, 10th Fl, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Sep;18(6 Suppl):s156-62.
Our purposes were: (1) to describe how 14 multi-stakeholder alliances participating in the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative approached the charge of improving healthcare delivery at the community level between 2006 and 2010; and (2) to offer insights to policy makers and program planners seeking to promote or establish community-wide quality improvement (QI).
This was a qualitative study.
A total of 84 semi-structured interviews were conducted with AF4Q alliance leaders between 2006 and 2010, and an iterative coding process was used to identify salient themes. Program documents supplemented the interview data and were used to develop an inventory of the alliances' QI activities using the Leatherman and Sutherland taxonomy of quality-enhancing interventions.
Alliances spent years planning their QI approaches and activities. Initial selection of QI activities was driven by the availability of local expertise and resources, rather than alignment with a community-wide vision for quality. Alliances were just as likely to rely on local partners to lead QI activities as they were to establish their own activities. The most commonly adopted QI activities were collaboratives aimed at producing organizational-level changes.
Policy makers and program planners seeking to promote community-wide QI should consider developing clear expectations, offering technical assistance at the start of the program, providing information on the evidence base for QI activities, and highlighting additional funding opportunities that could support QI activities. Alliances may need a stronger push to move beyond coordinated, organizational-level activities to more community-focused, cross-organizational QI activities.
我们的目的是:(1)描述参与“质量联盟行动”(Aligning Forces for Quality,AF4Q)计划的 14 个多方利益相关者联盟在 2006 年至 2010 年间如何承担改善社区一级医疗服务提供的任务;(2)为寻求促进或建立社区范围质量改进(Quality Improvement,QI)的政策制定者和方案规划者提供见解。
这是一项定性研究。
在 2006 年至 2010 年间,对 AF4Q 联盟领导人进行了总共 84 次半结构式访谈,并采用迭代编码过程来确定突出的主题。方案文件补充了访谈数据,并根据 Leatherman 和 Sutherland 的质量增强干预分类法,用于开发联盟 QI 活动清单。
联盟花了多年时间规划他们的 QI 方法和活动。最初选择 QI 活动是由当地专业知识和资源的可用性驱动的,而不是与社区范围内的质量愿景保持一致。联盟既可能依赖当地合作伙伴来领导 QI 活动,也可能建立自己的活动。最常采用的 QI 活动是旨在产生组织层面变化的协作。
寻求促进社区范围 QI 的政策制定者和方案规划者应考虑制定明确的期望,在计划开始时提供技术援助,提供 QI 活动证据基础的信息,并强调可以支持 QI 活动的其他资金机会。联盟可能需要更有力的推动,从协调的、组织层面的活动转变为更以社区为重点的、跨组织的 QI 活动。