• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“推动质量改进联盟”:背景与 2005 年至 2012 年的演变。

The Aligning Forces for Quality initiative: background and evolution from 2005 to 2012.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2012 Sep;18(6 Suppl):s115-25.

PMID:23286706
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF's) Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative is the largest privately funded community-based quality improvement initiative to date, providing funds and technical assistance (TA) to 16 multi-stakeholder alliances located throughout the United States. The objectives of this article are to describe the AF4Q initiative's underlying theory of change, its evolution over time, and the key activities undertaken by alliances.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a descriptive overview of a major multi-site, community-based quality improvement initiative.

METHODS

A qualitative approach was used with information obtained from program documents, program meetings, observation of alliance activities, and interviews with RWJF staff, TA providers, and AF4Q alliance stakeholders.

RESULTS

AF4Q is a dynamic initiative, expanding and evolving over time. Participating alliances are addressing 5 main programmatic areas: (1) measurement and public reporting of healthcare quality and efficiency for ambulatory physician practices and hospitals; (2) efforts to engage consumers as partners in their own care (consumer engagement); (3) adoption and spread of effective quality improvement strategies to improve care; (4) ensuring the equitable receipt of healthcare; and (5) integration of alliance activities with payment reform initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

The AF4Q initiative is an ambitious program affecting multiple leverage points in the healthcare system. AF4Q alliances were provided a similar set of expectations and given access to substantial TA. While participating alliances have made progress in addressing the AF4Q programmatic areas, given differences in the alliances' composition, market structure, and history, there is considerable variation in program implementation.

摘要

目的

罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会(RWJF)的“合力改善质量”(AF4Q)倡议是迄今为止最大的私人资助的以社区为基础的质量改进倡议,为美国各地的 16 个多利益相关者联盟提供资金和技术援助(TA)。本文的目的是描述 AF4Q 倡议的变革理论、随时间的演变以及联盟所采取的关键活动。

研究设计

这是对一个主要的多地点、以社区为基础的质量改进倡议的描述性概述。

方法

采用定性方法,从项目文件、项目会议、联盟活动观察以及对 RWJF 工作人员、TA 提供者和 AF4Q 联盟利益相关者的采访中获取信息。

结果

AF4Q 是一个充满活力的倡议,随着时间的推移不断扩展和演变。参与的联盟正在解决 5 个主要的项目领域:(1)测量和公布门诊医生实践和医院的医疗保健质量和效率;(2)努力让消费者作为其自身护理的合作伙伴参与进来(消费者参与);(3)采用和传播有效的质量改进策略以改善护理;(4)确保公平获得医疗保健;以及(5)将联盟活动与支付改革倡议整合。

结论

AF4Q 倡议是一个雄心勃勃的项目,影响医疗保健系统的多个杠杆点。AF4Q 联盟获得了一套类似的期望,并获得了大量的 TA。虽然参与的联盟在解决 AF4Q 项目领域方面取得了进展,但鉴于联盟的组成、市场结构和历史的差异,在项目实施方面存在相当大的差异。

相似文献

1
The Aligning Forces for Quality initiative: background and evolution from 2005 to 2012.“推动质量改进联盟”:背景与 2005 年至 2012 年的演变。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Sep;18(6 Suppl):s115-25.
2
The Aligning Forces for Quality initiative: background and evolution from 2005 to 2015.质量对齐力量倡议:2005年至2015年的背景与演变
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s346-59.
3
Summative evaluation results and lessons learned from the Aligning Forces for Quality program.质量对齐计划的总结性评估结果及经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s360-72.
4
Lessons learned about advancing healthcare equity from the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.从“质量对齐力量”倡议中汲取的推进医疗公平的经验教训。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s413-22.
5
Evaluating a complex, multi-site, community-based program to improve healthcare quality: the summative research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.评估一项旨在提高医疗质量的复杂、多地点、基于社区的项目:质量对齐倡议的总结性研究设计。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):es8-es16.
6
Aligning Forces for Quality multi-stakeholder healthcare alliances: do they have a sustainable future?为质量联合力量:多方利益相关者医疗联盟能否拥有可持续的未来?
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s423-36.
7
Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality: research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.评估一项旨在提高医疗质量的社区项目:对齐质量力量倡议的研究设计。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Sep;18(6 Suppl):s165-76.
8
Advancing Payment Reform at the Community Level.推进社区层面的支付改革。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):111-20. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000094.
9
Improving care delivery at the community level: an examination of the AF4Q legacy.改善社区层面的医疗服务提供:对“医疗服务价值评估与改进(AF4Q)”项目遗产的审视
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s393-402.
10
From rhetoric to reality: consumer engagement in 16 multi-stakeholder alliances.从言辞到现实:消费者参与16个多方利益相关者联盟的情况
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug;22(12 Suppl):s403-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
2
Challenges and Lessons Learned from Multi-Level Multi-Component Interventions to Prevent and Reduce Childhood Obesity.多层面多组分干预预防和减少儿童肥胖的挑战与经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 24;16(1):30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010030.
3
Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda.
运用变革理论指导卫生系统研究与创新的实施:孟加拉国、印度和乌干达未来卫生系统联盟合作伙伴的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y.
4
Strengthening Multipayer Collaboration: Lessons From the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.加强多方合作:综合初级保健倡议的经验教训
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):602-633. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12280.
5
Synthesis Of Research On Patient-Centered Medical Homes Brings Systematic Differences Into Relief.以患者为中心的医疗之家的研究综述揭示了系统差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):500-508. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1235.
6
Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.有人关注医生成绩单吗?可获取性增加对消费者对医生质量信息的认知和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1570-1589. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12540. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Promoting Patient and Family Partnerships in Ambulatory Care Improvement: A Narrative Review and Focus Group Findings.促进门诊护理改善中的患者及家庭伙伴关系:一项叙述性综述及焦点小组研究结果
Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1417-39. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0364-z. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
8
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Influenza Vaccination of Chronically Ill US Adults: The Mediating Role of Perceived Discrimination in Health Care.美国慢性病成年患者流感疫苗接种中的种族/族裔差异:医疗保健中感知到的歧视的中介作用。
Med Care. 2016 Jun;54(6):570-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000544.
9
Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review.运用变革理论设计和评估公共卫生干预措施:一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2016 May 6;11:63. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0422-6.
10
Balancing stakeholder needs in the evaluation of healthcare quality improvement.在医疗质量改进评估中平衡利益相关者的需求。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Oct;25(10):803-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004814. Epub 2016 Feb 18.