员工为导向的健康促进和健康计划的经济影响的证据进行系统回顾。
A systematic review of the evidence concerning the economic impact of employee-focused health promotion and wellness programs.
机构信息
Program on Health, Work and Productivity, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
出版信息
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Feb;55(2):209-22. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182728d3c.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the evidence regarding the economic impact of worker health promotion programs.
OBJECTIVE
Peer-reviewed research articles were identified from a database search. Included articles were published between January 2000 and May 2010, described a study conducted in the United States that used an experimental or quasi-experimental study design and analyzed medical, pharmacy (direct), and/or work productivity (indirect) costs. A multidisciplinary review team, following specific criteria, assessed research quality.
RESULTS
Of 2030 retrieved articles, 44 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 were of sufficient quality to be considered evidentiary. Only three analyzed direct and indirect costs.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence regarding economic impact is limited and inconsistent. Higher-quality research is needed to demonstrate the value of specific programs.
目的
评估工人健康促进计划的经济影响的证据。
方法
从数据库搜索中确定了同行评审的研究文章。纳入的文章发表于 2000 年 1 月至 2010 年 5 月期间，描述了在美国进行的一项使用实验或准实验研究设计并分析医疗、药房（直接）和/或工作生产力（间接）成本的研究。一个多学科审查小组根据具体标准评估了研究质量。
结果
在 2030 篇检索到的文章中，有 44 篇符合研究纳入标准。其中，有 10 篇的质量足以被认为是证据性的。只有三篇分析了直接和间接成本。
结论
关于经济影响的证据是有限的且不一致。需要更高质量的研究来证明特定计划的价值。
Zotero 插件