Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):e77-84. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31827127e4.
The objective of this study was to determine current practices of anticoagulation in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Internet-based cross-sectional survey distributed between November 2010 and May 2011.
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization-registered extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers internationally.
: Extracorporeal membrane oxy genation medical directors and coordinators.
None.
There were 121 responses from extracorporeal membrane oxy genation medical directors and coordinators at 187 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers with access to the survey. Eighty-four of 117 (72%) respondents reported having a written institutional extracorporeal membrane oxy genation protocol for both anticoagulation and blood product management at their institutions. Sixty-nine of 117 (59%) respondents reported use of tip-to-tip or partially heparin-bonded circuits. Unfractionated heparin was used at all centers; only 8% of respondents indicated use of alternative anticoagulation medications in the six months prior to the survey. The preferred method of anticoagulation monitoring was the serial measurement of activated clotting time, as reported by 97% of respondents. In this survey, 82% of respondents reported antithrombin III testing, 65% reported anti-factor Xa testing, and 43% reported use of thromboelastography during extracorporeal membrane oxy genation. Goal ranges for these three tests and interventions triggered by out-of-range values were found to be variable.
Extracorporeal membrane oxy genation anticoagulation management policies vary widely by center. The majority of extracorporeal membrane oxy genation programs employ activated clotting time as the preferred anticoagulation monitoring tool. The coagulation system is also monitored using more specific markers such as antithrombin III, anti-factor Xa, and thromboelastography by a large number of centers. Future research is needed to elucidate optimal anticoagulation management and improve outcomes.
本研究旨在确定体外膜氧合患者的抗凝现状。
2010 年 11 月至 2011 年 5 月期间进行的基于互联网的横断面调查。
国际体外生命支持组织注册的体外膜氧合中心。
体外膜氧合医学主任和协调员。
无。
来自 187 个体外生命支持组织中心的 121 名体外膜氧合医学主任和协调员对调查做出了回应,这些中心可以访问该调查。117 名受访者中有 84 名(72%)报告称,他们所在机构有关于抗凝和血液制品管理的书面机构体外膜氧合方案。117 名受访者中有 69 名(59%)报告使用了尖端到尖端或部分肝素结合回路。所有中心均使用未分级肝素;只有 8%的受访者表示在调查前六个月使用了替代抗凝药物。97%的受访者报告说,首选的抗凝监测方法是连续测量活化凝血时间。在这项调查中,82%的受访者报告了抗凝血酶 III 检测,65%报告了抗因子 Xa 检测,43%报告了在体外膜氧合期间使用血栓弹性描记术。发现这三种测试的目标范围和因超出范围值而触发的干预措施存在差异。
各中心的体外膜氧合抗凝管理政策差异很大。大多数体外膜氧合计划采用活化凝血时间作为首选抗凝监测工具。大量中心还使用更具体的标志物,如抗凝血酶 III、抗因子 Xa 和血栓弹性描记术来监测凝血系统。需要进一步的研究来阐明最佳的抗凝管理并改善结果。