Department of Food Engineering, Agricultural Faculty, University of Uludag, Gorukle Campus, Bursa, Turkey.
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Jan 23;61(3):532-9. doi: 10.1021/jf304074m. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
Muscadine grapes ( Vitis rotundifolia ) are widely grown in the southern United States, as the more common Vitis vinifera cannot be cultivated due to Pierce's disease. There is interest to determine if certain cultivars can be used for good-quality wine production. This study compared the effect of pectolytic enzyme pretreatment with conventional skin-contact fermentation on Muscadine (Noble, Vitis rotundifolia ) wine major volatiles, aroma active volatiles, and volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs). Volatile composition, aroma activity, and VSCs in the initial juice and wine samples after 3 years were determined by gas chromatography in combination with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), olfactory detection (GC-O), and pulsed flame photometric detection (GC-PFPD). Forty-three nonethanol MS volatiles were common to all samples. Total ion chromatogram (TIC) MS peak area increased 91% in the skin-contact wines from the initial juice but only 24% in the enzyme-treated wine. Thirty-one VSCs were detected. Twenty-four sulfur volatiles were identified by matching their retention characteristics on polar and nonpolar columns with those of standards or MS spectrum matches. Six of these (sulfur dioxide, 1-propanethiol, 3-mercapto-2-pentanone, 3-mercapto-2-butanone, 2,8-epithio-cis-p-menthane, and 1-p-menthene-8-thiol) were reported for the first time in muscadine wine. Five additional VSCs were tentatively identified by matching standardized retention values with literature values, and two remain unidentified. Total sulfur peak areas increased 400% in the skin-contact wine and 560% in the enzyme-treated wine compared to the initial juice. There were 42 aroma-active volatiles in the initial juice, 48 in the skin-contact wine, and 66 in the enzyme-treated wine. Eleven aroma-active volatiles in the skin-contact wine and 16 aroma volatiles in the enzyme-treated wine appear to be due to sulfur volatiles. Pectolytic enzyme-treated wines contained less total volatiles but more sulfur and aroma-active volatiles than the traditional skin-contact wine.
麝香葡萄(Vitis rotundifolia)在美国南部广泛种植,因为更常见的 Vitis vinifera 由于 Pierce 氏病而无法种植。人们有兴趣确定某些品种是否可以用于生产高质量的葡萄酒。本研究比较了果胶酶预处理与传统果皮接触发酵对麝香葡萄(Noble,Vitis rotundifolia)葡萄酒主要挥发性、香气活性挥发性和挥发性硫化合物(VSCs)的影响。通过气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)、嗅觉检测(GC-O)和脉冲火焰光度检测(GC-PFPD),在初始果汁和 3 年后的葡萄酒样品中测定挥发性成分、香气活性和 VSCs。所有样品中共有 43 种非乙醇 MS 挥发性物质。与酶处理的葡萄酒相比,果皮接触葡萄酒的总离子色谱(TIC)MS 峰面积从初始果汁增加了 91%,而仅增加了 24%。检测到 31 种 VSCs。通过在极性和非极性柱上匹配保留特征与标准品或 MS 光谱匹配,鉴定出 24 种硫挥发性物质。其中 6 种(二氧化硫、1-丙硫醇、3-巯基-2-戊酮、3-巯基-2-丁酮、2,8-环氧顺式-p-薄荷烷和 1-薄荷烯-8-硫醇)首次报道在麝香葡萄酒中。通过与文献值匹配标准保留值,还暂定鉴定出 5 种其他 VSCs,另有 2 种仍未鉴定。与初始果汁相比,果皮接触葡萄酒和酶处理葡萄酒的总硫峰面积分别增加了 400%和 560%。初始果汁中有 42 种香气活性挥发性物质,果皮接触葡萄酒中有 48 种,酶处理葡萄酒中有 66 种。果皮接触葡萄酒中有 11 种香气活性挥发性物质和酶处理葡萄酒中有 16 种香气挥发性物质似乎是由于硫挥发性物质的原因。与传统的果皮接触葡萄酒相比,果胶酶处理的葡萄酒含有较少的总挥发性物质,但含有更多的硫和香气活性挥发性物质。