• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩袖修补术后肩部僵硬:危险因素及对疗效的影响。

Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.023. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.023
PMID:23290184
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of postoperative stiffness after rotator cuff repair and to evaluate postoperative stiffness with respect to its risk factors and its influence on outcome.

METHODS

We included 288 patients (mean age, 59.5 ± 8.4 years) who underwent surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Postoperative range of motion was measured serially 3 months, 6 months, and at least 1 year (mean, 22.8 ± 13.1 months) after surgery. Simultaneously, functional outcome was evaluated using the pain visual analog scale (VAS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and cuff healing was confirmed by computed tomography arthrography or ultrasonography at least 1 year after surgery (mean, 13.5 ± 2.7 months). We calculated the serial incidence of postoperative stiffness at each follow-up visit, assessed the risk factors for postoperative stiffness at each period, and then evaluated the correlation of stiffness with cuff healing and functional outcome.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative stiffness was 18.6% (54/288) at 3 months, 2.8% (8/288) at 6 months, and 6.6% (19/288) at final follow-up. Mean age was higher in the stiffness group at all times (all P < .05). Preoperative stiffness affected postoperative stiffness only at 3 months (P = .04). Larger tear size, higher grade of fatty infiltration (FI), and open or mini-open surgery were correlated with stiffness only at final follow-up (all P < .05). More patients with final postoperative stiffness showed retear (17/19, 89.5%) compared with those without stiffness (49/269, 18.2%, P < .001), and retear was an independent factor for late postoperative stiffness. Pain VAS was higher in the stiffness group at 3 months and final follow-up (all P < .01), and ASES score was lower in the stiffness group only at final follow-up (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Old age is an important risk factor for postoperative stiffness throughout the follow-up period. Early postoperative stiffness is affected by preoperative stiffness. However, late postoperative stiffness, especially newly developed stiffness, is closely related to retear and significantly worse functional outcome after surgical repair, even though we could not find the cause-effect relation. When a patient complains about newly developed stiffness in the late postoperative period, retear should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定肩袖修复术后僵硬的发生率,并评估术后僵硬与其危险因素的关系及其对结果的影响。

方法

我们纳入了 288 例(平均年龄 59.5±8.4 岁)接受全层肩袖撕裂手术修复的患者。术后 3 个月、6 个月和至少 1 年(平均 22.8±13.1 个月)时连续测量术后活动范围。同时,使用疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分评估功能结果,并在术后至少 1 年(平均 13.5±2.7 个月)时通过计算机断层关节造影或超声检查确认肩袖愈合。我们计算了每个随访时的术后僵硬发生率,评估了每个时期术后僵硬的危险因素,然后评估了僵硬与肩袖愈合和功能结果的相关性。

结果

术后 3 个月、6 个月和最终随访时的僵硬发生率分别为 18.6%(54/288)、2.8%(8/288)和 6.6%(19/288)。在所有时间点,僵硬组的平均年龄均较高(均 P<.05)。术前僵硬仅在 3 个月时影响术后僵硬(P=0.04)。较大的撕裂尺寸、较高的脂肪浸润(FI)分级和开放或小切口手术仅与最终随访时的僵硬相关(均 P<.05)。与无僵硬组(49/269,18.2%,P<.001)相比,最终术后僵硬组中更多的患者出现肩袖再撕裂(17/19,89.5%),肩袖再撕裂是晚期术后僵硬的独立因素。在 3 个月和最终随访时,僵硬组的疼痛 VAS 评分较高(均 P<.01),而在最终随访时,僵硬组的 ASES 评分较低(P=0.03)。

结论

高龄是整个随访期间术后僵硬的重要危险因素。早期术后僵硬受术前僵硬的影响。然而,晚期术后僵硬,尤其是新出现的僵硬,与肩袖再撕裂密切相关,且术后手术修复的功能结果明显较差,尽管我们尚未找到其因果关系。当患者在术后晚期出现新的僵硬时,应考虑肩袖再撕裂。

证据等级

IV 级,治疗性病例系列。

相似文献

1
Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome.肩袖修补术后肩部僵硬:危险因素及对疗效的影响。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.023. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
2
A comparison of 2 repair techniques for partial-thickness articular-sided rotator cuff tears.两种部分厚度关节侧旋转袖撕裂修复技术的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
3
Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome.影响肩袖修复解剖学结果的预后因素及其与功能结果的相关性。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):30-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
4
A comparison of outcomes after arthroscopic repair of partial versus small or medium-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tears.关节镜下修复部分与小或中大小全层肩袖撕裂的结果比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):1078-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00519.
5
Outcome of rotator cuff repair in large-to-massive tear with pseudoparalysis: a comparative study with propensity score matching.肩袖撕裂伴假性瘫痪患者的修复效果:一项倾向评分匹配的对比研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1413-20. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399865. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
6
Clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation for rotator cuff tear with stiffness: a matched-pair comparative study between patients with and without stiffness.关节镜下关节囊松解及手法治疗伴僵硬的肩袖撕裂的肩袖修复临床疗效:僵硬与非僵硬患者的配对比较研究
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
7
Arthroscopic repair of massive contracted rotator cuff tears: aggressive release with anterior and posterior interval slides do not improve cuff healing and integrity.关节镜下治疗巨大回缩性肩袖撕裂:采用前、后间隔滑动松解术进行积极松解并不能改善肩袖愈合和完整性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):1482-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01193.
8
Repair integrity and functional outcomes for arthroscopic margin convergence of rotator cuff tears.关节镜下修复肩袖撕裂的边缘收敛术的修复完整性和功能结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20;95(6):536-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00397.
9
Postoperative stiff shoulder after open rotator cuff repair: a 3- to 20-year follow-up study.开放性肩袖修复术后的肩部僵硬:一项3至20年的随访研究。
Scand J Surg. 2014 Dec;103(4):263-70. doi: 10.1177/1457496913514383. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
10
Arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair: functional outcome, repair integrity, and preoperative factors related to postoperative outcome.关节镜下缝线桥修复肩袖:功能结果、修复完整性以及与术后结果相关的术前因素。
Phys Sportsmed. 2016;44(2):126-32. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2016.1168271. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment and validation of a screening and risk predication model for rotator cuff tear and shoulder stiffness.肩袖撕裂和肩部僵硬筛查及风险预测模型的建立与验证
Ann Jt. 2025 Jul 30;10:24. doi: 10.21037/aoj-25-16. eCollection 2025.
2
Application and analysis of the arthroscopic remnant-preserving technique to rotator cuff tear: a retrospective study.关节镜下保留残余组织技术在肩袖撕裂中的应用与分析:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 30;12:1602709. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1602709. eCollection 2025.
3
Three-dimensional evaluation of stem placement accuracy with the conventional guide in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and its relevance to clinical outcomes.
使用传统导向器在反肩关节置换术中对假体柄置入准确性的三维评估及其与临床结果的相关性。
JSES Int. 2024 Nov 8;9(2):436-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.030. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Is it necessary to use a sling or abduction pillow sling after superior rotator cuff repair? A preliminary report.肩袖肌群上部分修复术后是否有必要使用吊带或外展枕吊带?初步报告。
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 31;70(4):486-494. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.12653. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Evaluating postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic rotator interval release after rotator cuff repair: a randomized prospective trial.评估肩袖修复术后关节镜下肩袖间隙松解的术后结果:一项随机前瞻性试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.050.
6
Association of Antihypertensive and Statin Medication Usage With Postoperative Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.关节镜下肩袖修补术后降压药和他汀类药物使用与术后僵硬的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jan 16;13(1):23259671241305089. doi: 10.1177/23259671241305089. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Factors associated with patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: do they differ by age?关节镜下肩袖修复术后患者满意度的相关因素:它们在不同年龄组中有差异吗?
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Sep;27(3):345-352. doi: 10.5397/cise.2024.00283. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
8
Passive shoulder abduction range of motion at 3 months postoperatively is the most important prognostic factor for achieving full recovery of range of motion at 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜下肩袖修补术后3个月时的被动肩关节外展活动度是术后6个月实现活动度完全恢复的最重要预后因素。
JSES Int. 2024 Apr 7;8(4):806-814. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.010. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Risk factors influencing postoperative outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and construction of a nomogram prediction model.影响关节镜下肩袖修复术后结果的危险因素及列线图预测模型的构建
Am J Transl Res. 2024 May 15;16(5):1731-1739. doi: 10.62347/OBQN3015. eCollection 2024.
10
Factors influencing shoulder stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures.影响肱骨近端骨折切开复位内固定术后肩关节僵硬的因素。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024 Apr 26;35(2):285-292. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1529.