Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Biochem. 2013 May;46(7-8):622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
Clinical assessment of the SPAPLUS® system for the determination of the serum free light chains kappa (κ FLC) and lambda (λ FLC) compared to the BNII®.
126 serum specimens from our routine activity were analysed on two different analysers: the BNII® (immunonephelometry, Siemens) and the SPAPLUS® (turbidimetry, Binding Site). We compared the absolute values of the serum κ FLC and λ FLC, as well as the FLC κ/λ ratio on both analysers. These results were further evaluated together with the clinical history of the patients.
Regression analysis between the BNII® and the SPAPLUS® for κ FLC and λ FLC did not display any significant differences between both methods in the normal and pathological ranges. Nevertheless, some differences have been observed for some patients in the absolute value of the involved light chain, with potential clinical implications.
The results show overall good concordance between both methods. However, it is recommended that the monitoring of patients affected by monoclonal gammapathies by measuring FLC, be performed in the same laboratory and by the same method. Moreover, the FLC results should always be interpreted together with other laboratory tests taking into account the patient's diagnosis.
与 BNII®相比,评估 SPAPLUS®系统用于测定血清游离轻链 kappa(κ FLC)和 lambda(λ FLC)的临床性能。
对我们常规检测中的 126 份血清标本,在两台不同的分析仪上进行分析:BNII®(免疫比浊法,西门子)和 SPAPLUS®(胶乳增强散射比浊法,Binding Site)。我们比较了两种分析仪上κ FLC 和 λ FLC 的绝对数值,以及 FLC κ/λ 比值。这些结果与患者的临床病史一起进行进一步评估。
BNII®和 SPAPLUS®之间的回归分析显示,在正常和病理范围内,两种方法之间的 κ FLC 和 λ FLC 没有显著差异。然而,对于一些患者,两种方法在受累轻链的绝对值上存在一些差异,具有潜在的临床意义。
结果表明两种方法总体上具有良好的一致性。然而,建议在同一家实验室和使用相同的方法,对患有单克隆丙种球蛋白病的患者进行 FLC 监测。此外,应始终结合其他实验室检查结果,考虑患者的诊断,对 FLC 结果进行解释。