AUTONOMY, LIBERTY, AND MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING.
作者信息
Coggon John, Miola José
机构信息
School of Law, University of Manchester.
出版信息
Camb Law J. 2011 Nov;70(3):523-547. doi: 10.1017/S0008197311000845.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
AUTONOMY, LIBERTY, AND MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING.自主性、自由与医疗决策
Camb Law J. 2011 Nov;70(3):523-547. doi: 10.1017/S0008197311000845.
2
Respect for Autonomy in Light of Neuropsychiatry.从神经精神病学角度看对自主性的尊重
Bioethics. 2017 Jun;31(5):360-367. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12359.
3
Reproductive autonomy as self-making: procreative liberty and the practice of ethical subjectivity.作为自我塑造的生殖自主权：生育自由与伦理主体性的实践。
J Med Philos. 2013 Dec;38(6):639-56. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht046.
4
Deprivation of patient liberty: a qualitative study of current practice among geriatricians in a tertiary setting.剥夺患者自由：三级医疗机构老年科医生当前实践的定性研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;191(2):929-936. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02615-1. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
Identifying a deprivation of liberty.确定是否存在人身自由剥夺情况。
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Jan;21(1):52-4. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.1.52.
6
What Does "Least Restrictive" or "Less Restrictive" Mean in Mental Health Law? Contradictions and Confusion in the Case of Queensland, Australia.在精神卫生法中，“最不限制”或“较少限制”是什么意思？澳大利亚昆士兰州案例中的矛盾与困惑。
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):286-300. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.32. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
7
Identifying a deprivation of liberty: a guide for community nurses.识别自由受限情况：社区护士指南
Br J Community Nurs. 2012 Nov;17(11):548-52. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2012.17.11.548.
8
Respect for personal autonomy, human dignity, and the problems of self-directedness and botched autonomy.尊重个人自主性、人类尊严以及自我导向和自主性失败的问题。
J Med Philos. 2011 Oct;36(5):496-515. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr035. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
9
"She's Not Ready to Give Up Yet!": When a Family Member Overrides the Patient's Medical Decisions.“她还没准备好放弃！”：当家庭成员推翻患者的医疗决策时。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
10
B. v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto.
Dom Law Rep. 1995 Jan 27;122:1-92.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical Considerations in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Health Care: A Comprehensive Review.医疗保健中人工智能和机器学习使用的伦理考量：全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):e62443. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Preconception education program for non-invasive prenatal testing focused on interest in genetics among female university students in Japan: a quasi-experimental study comparing pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up results.日本针对女大学生开展的非侵入性产前检测孕前教育项目：一项比较干预前、干预后及三个月随访结果的准实验研究，重点关注女大学生对遗传学的兴趣。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;81(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01157-5.
3
Evolved Eugenics and Reinforcement of "Othering": Renewed Ethico-Legal Perspectives of Genome Editing in Reproduction.进化的优生学与“他者化”的强化：生殖领域基因编辑的伦理法律新视角
BioTech (Basel). 2023 Jul 11;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/biotech12030051.
4
Primary care provider attitudes, experiences and practices about cannabidiol (CBD) and barriers to patient-provider communication about CBD use: A qualitative study.初级医疗服务提供者对大麻二酚（CBD）的态度、经验和做法以及关于CBD使用的医患沟通障碍：一项定性研究。
PEC Innov. 2022 Apr 28;1:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100044. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Caregivers' perceptions of compulsory treatment of physical illness in involuntarily psychiatric hospitalization.照顾者对非自愿性精神科住院患者躯体疾病强制治疗的看法。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 May;30(3):423-436. doi: 10.1177/09697330221140493. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
6
Cultural Differences in Patients' Preferences for Paternalism: Comparing Mexican and American Patients' Preferences for and Experiences with Physician Paternalism and Patient Autonomy.患者对家长主义偏好的文化差异：比较墨西哥和美国患者对医生家长主义和患者自主权的偏好和体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(17):10663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710663.
7
Impact of Pharmacists' Interventions and Patients' Decision on Health Outcomes in Terms of Medication Adherence and Quality Use of Medicines among Patients Attending Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review.社区药房中，药师干预和患者决策对药物依从性和药物合理使用的健康结局的影响：系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094392.
8
The capacity of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder individuals to make autonomous decisions about pharmacological treatments for their illness in real life: A scoping review.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者在现实生活中对其疾病药物治疗做出自主决策的能力：一项范围综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 9;3(3):e179. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.179. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Ensuring Risk Awareness of Vulnerable Patients in the Post-Montgomery Era: Treading a Fine Line.后蒙哥马利时代：脆弱患者风险意识的保障——走钢丝。
Health Care Anal. 2020 Sep;28(3):283-298. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00396-9.
10
The Limits of Empowerment: How to Reframe the Role of mHealth Tools in the Healthcare Ecosystem.赋权的局限性：如何重新构建移动医疗工具在医疗生态系统中的角色。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1159-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00115-1. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
本文引用的文献
1
To empower or to protect? Constructing the 'vulnerable adult' in English law and public policy.赋权还是保护？英国法律与公共政策中“弱势成年人”的构建
Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars). 2008 Jun;28(2):234-253. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00085.x.
2
Autonomy and welfare as amici curiae.作为法庭之友的自主权与福利。
Med Law Rev. 2010 Winter;18(1):86-95. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwp023. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
3
On the materiality of risk: paper tigers and panaceas.论风险的重要性：纸老虎与万灵药
Med Law Rev. 2009 Spring;17(1):76-108. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwn024. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
4
Varied and principled understandings of autonomy in English law: justifiable inconsistency or blinkered moralism?英国法律中对自主性的多样且有原则的理解：是合理的不一致还是狭隘的道德主义？
Health Care Anal. 2007 Sep;15(3):235-55. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0062-8.
5
Autonomy, consent and persuasion.自主性、同意与说服。
Eur J Health Law. 2006 Dec;13(4):321-38. doi: 10.1163/157180906779160274.
6
Losing the wood for the trees: Burke and the Court of Appeal. R (on the Application of Oliver Leslie Burke) v. The General Medical Council.
Med Law Rev. 2006 Summer;14(2):253-63. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwl006. Epub 2006 May 2.
7
Autonomy rued OK? Al Hamwi v. Johnston and another.
Med Law Rev. 2006 Spring;14(1):108-14. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwi039. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
8
The conflation of competence and capacity in english medical law: a philosophical critique.英国医疗法中能力与行为能力的 conflation：一项哲学批判。（注：“conflation”这个词在这里可能有误，推测可能是“confusion”，即“混淆”，如果是这样，整句可译为“英国医疗法中能力与行为能力的混淆：一项哲学批判” ）
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(3):357-69. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-0537-z.
9
Bioethics as politics: the limits of moral expertise.作为政治的生物伦理学：道德专业知识的局限性
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2005 Sep;15(3):305-22. doi: 10.1353/ken.2005.0023.
10
Are the courts excessively deferential to the medical profession?法院是否对医疗行业过度尊重？
Med Law Rev. 2001 Spring;9(1):1-16. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/9.1.1.
Zotero 插件