• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对家长主义偏好的文化差异:比较墨西哥和美国患者对医生家长主义和患者自主权的偏好和体验。

Cultural Differences in Patients' Preferences for Paternalism: Comparing Mexican and American Patients' Preferences for and Experiences with Physician Paternalism and Patient Autonomy.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, Brigham Young University, 800 KMBL, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(17):10663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710663.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710663
PMID:36078378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518551/
Abstract

Following up on previous research demonstrating the high level of care realized by a paternalistic Mexican physician, the present research further explored the hypothesis that there are cultural differences in preferences for and experiences with physician paternalism vs. patient autonomy in White American culture as compared with Mexican culture. In this research, we interviewed sixty (60) people including twenty (20) Mexican, twenty (20) Mexican American, and twenty (20) White American respondents. We asked these patients about their experiences with and attitudes towards paternalism and patient autonomy in healthcare interactions. With some caveats, our data showed strong support for both hypotheses while also suggesting a high level of care can be realized by paternalistic physicians when "paternalism" is understood in a cultural context. We close with a brief consideration of the implications of these findings.

摘要

继先前的研究证明了一位家长式作风的墨西哥医生所能实现的高水平医疗护理之后,本研究进一步探讨了一个假设,即在白种美国人文化中,与墨西哥文化相比,对于医生家长式作风与患者自主性的偏好和体验存在文化差异。在这项研究中,我们采访了六十(60)人,包括二十(20)名墨西哥人、二十(20)名墨西哥裔美国人以及二十(20)名白种美国人。我们询问了这些患者在医疗保健互动中对家长式作风和患者自主性的体验和态度。有一些警告,但我们的数据强烈支持这两个假设,同时也表明,当“家长式作风”在文化背景下被理解时,家长式作风的医生也能实现高水平的护理。我们最后简要考虑了这些发现的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/14a0972e437e/ijerph-19-10663-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/4fda277c3c3c/ijerph-19-10663-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/8c6fdd229862/ijerph-19-10663-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/d86924d3d8b6/ijerph-19-10663-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/fdfb51f44964/ijerph-19-10663-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/14a0972e437e/ijerph-19-10663-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/4fda277c3c3c/ijerph-19-10663-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/8c6fdd229862/ijerph-19-10663-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/d86924d3d8b6/ijerph-19-10663-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/fdfb51f44964/ijerph-19-10663-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f7/9518551/14a0972e437e/ijerph-19-10663-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural Differences in Patients' Preferences for Paternalism: Comparing Mexican and American Patients' Preferences for and Experiences with Physician Paternalism and Patient Autonomy.患者对家长主义偏好的文化差异:比较墨西哥和美国患者对医生家长主义和患者自主权的偏好和体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(17):10663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710663.
2
Can Physicians Demonstrate High Quality Care Using Paternalistic Practices? A Case Study of Paternalism in Latino Physician-Patient Interactions.医生能否通过家长式作风来体现高质量的医疗服务?以拉丁裔医患互动中的家长式作风为例。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Oct;28(12):1910-1922. doi: 10.1177/1049732318783696. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Four shades of paternalism in doctor-patient communication and their ethical implications.医患沟通中的四种家长主义倾向及其伦理意蕴
Bioethics. 2024 Jul;38(6):539-548. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13307. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
The new paternalism.新家长主义
Bioethics. 1988 Apr;2(2):103-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00040.x.
5
Decisional autonomy undermines advisees' judgments of experts in medicine and in life.决策自主性会损害被咨询者对医学和生活领域专家判断的信任。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 26;117(21):11368-11378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910572117. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.医学家长主义的辩护:最大化患者的自主性。
J Med Ethics. 1983 Mar;9(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jme.9.1.38.
7
Autonomy and paternalism in shared decision-making in a Saudi Arabian tertiary hospital: A cross-sectional study.在沙特阿拉伯一家三级医院的共享决策中自主权和家长主义:一项横断面研究。
Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(3):260-268. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12355. Epub 2022 May 19.
8
Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country.家长作风与自主性:一个转型期(后共产主义)国家中患者与医疗服务提供者的观点
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 29;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0059-z.
9
When open-ended questions don't work: the role of palliative paternalism in difficult medical decisions.当开放式问题不起作用时:姑息性家长主义在困难医疗决策中的作用。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):415-20. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0408. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.医患关系中的家长主义、患者自主权与道德考量:挪威医生的态度
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan;52(2):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00224-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust in physicians as a mediator of the relationship between person-centered care and medication adherence in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study.信任医生作为接受血液透析患者以患者为中心的护理与药物依从性之间关系的调解因素:一项横断面研究。
J Nephrol. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02387-2.
2
Support and care needs among Mexican women with metastatic breast cancer.患有转移性乳腺癌的墨西哥女性的支持与护理需求。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 23;33(6):494. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09529-z.
3
Navigating decisional conflict: laser peripheral iridotomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma prevention.

本文引用的文献

1
An overview on the promotion on patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Mexico.墨西哥促进以患者为中心的医疗照护和共同决策概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Jun;171:93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 21.
2
Communication patterns in the doctor-patient relationship: evaluating determinants associated with low paternalism in Mexico.医患关系中的沟通模式:评估墨西哥低家长式作风相关的决定因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Dec 10;21(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00566-3.
3
Defining What is Good: Pluralism and Healthcare Quality.
应对决策冲突:激光周边虹膜切开术预防原发性闭角型青光眼
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 18;18(4):627-636. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.04.08. eCollection 2025.
4
Stepped care, stepped care "lite" & matching intervention components to individual mental health needs: A rapid scoping review of mental health and substance use interventions for post-secondary students.逐步照护、“简化版”逐步照护以及使干预组件与个体心理健康需求相匹配:对高等院校学生心理健康及物质使用干预措施的快速范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319473. eCollection 2025.
5
Transnational Health and Self-care Experiences of Japanese Women who have taken Oral Contraceptives in South Korea, including Over-the-counter Access: Insights from Semi-structured Interviews.在韩国服用口服避孕药的日本女性的跨国健康与自我护理经历,包括非处方获取途径:来自半结构化访谈的见解
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):711-737. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00293-6. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Vaccine hesitancy educational interventions for medical students: A systematic narrative review in western countries.针对医学生的疫苗犹豫教育干预措施:西方国家的系统叙述性综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2397875. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2397875. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
7
Comparing Nephrologists' Self-Reported Decision-Making Skills and Treatment Attitudes With Their Patients' Experiences of Making Kidney Therapy Decisions and Receiving Nephrology Care.比较肾病学家自我报告的决策技能和治疗态度与患者在做出肾脏治疗决策及接受肾病护理方面的体验。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jun;42(6):587-593. doi: 10.1177/10499091241279939. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
8
Predicaments and coping strategies in implementing cancer truth-telling: a qualitative content analysis.实施癌症告知真相的困境与应对策略:一项定性内容分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 21;32(9):602. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08815-6.
9
Implementing a social prescribing program in primary care units in Portugal: A qualitative study exploring enablers, barriers and lessons learned from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the program implementation.在葡萄牙的基层医疗单位实施社会处方计划:一项从参与该计划实施的利益相关者角度探索促进因素、障碍和经验教训的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306404. eCollection 2024.
10
Impact of patient-centered communication on patient satisfaction scores in patients with chronic life-limiting illnesses: an experience from Kenya.以患者为中心的沟通对慢性终末期疾病患者满意度评分的影响:来自肯尼亚的经验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 22;11:1290907. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1290907. eCollection 2024.
界定何为优质:多元主义与医疗质量
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2019;29(4):367-388. doi: 10.1353/ken.2019.0030.
4
: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.纪念其四十周年。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Nov;19(11):9-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1665402.
5
Paternalism vs. Autonomy: Are They Alternative Types of Formal Care?家长式作风与自主权:它们是正式照护的不同类型吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 28;10:1460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01460. eCollection 2019.
6
Can Physicians Demonstrate High Quality Care Using Paternalistic Practices? A Case Study of Paternalism in Latino Physician-Patient Interactions.医生能否通过家长式作风来体现高质量的医疗服务?以拉丁裔医患互动中的家长式作风为例。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Oct;28(12):1910-1922. doi: 10.1177/1049732318783696. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Doctor-Patient Relationship Between Individuals With Fibromyalgia and Rheumatologists in Public and Private Health Care in Mexico.墨西哥公共和私人医疗保健机构中纤维肌痛患者与风湿病学家之间的医患关系
Qual Health Res. 2016 Oct;26(12):1674-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588742. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
Attributes of patient-centered primary care associated with the public perception of good healthcare quality in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and El Salvador.巴西、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和萨尔瓦多以患者为中心的初级保健属性与公众对优质医疗保健质量的认知
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):834-43. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv139. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
9
Reconceptualizing Autonomy: A Relational Turn in Bioethics.重新概念化自主性:生物伦理学的关系转向。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 May;46(3):11-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.544. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
10
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.