Suppr超能文献

患者在与乳腺癌专科医生会面时,是否会按提示使用决策和沟通辅助工具?

Do patients use decision and communication aids as prompted when meeting with breast cancer specialists?

作者信息

Volz Shelley, Moore Dan H, Belkora Jeffrey K

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, NC, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Jun;18(3):379-91. doi: 10.1111/hex.12042. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our breast cancer clinic promotes patient use of decision and communication aids (DAs/CAs) through two mechanisms: coaching and prompting. From January through September 2010, we provided services to 462 of 1106 new visitors (42%). Of those 462 visitors, 267 (58%) received coaching. For the remainder (195 or 42%), the best we could do was prompt them to self-administer the DA and CAs.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to learn whether patients prompted to use DAs/CAs did so.

METHODS

We surveyed prompted patients after their visits. We asked how much of each DA they reviewed, whether they listed questions, made notes and audio-recorded their consultations. We tallied frequencies and explored associations using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 195 prompted patients, 82 responded to surveys (42%). Nearly all (66/73 or 90%) reported reviewing some or all of the booklets and 52/73 (71%) reported viewing some or all of the DVDs. While 63/78 (81%) responded that they wrote a question list, only 14/61 (23%) said they showed it to their doctor. Two-thirds (51/77 or 66%) said someone took notes, but only 16/79 (20%) reported making audio recordings.

DISCUSSION

More patients reported following prompts to use DAs than CAs. Few reported showing question lists to physicians or recording their visits. Our exploratory analyses surfaced associations between using CAs and race/ethnicity or education that merit further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Prompting patients assures better use of decision than communication aids. Clinicians may need to take a more active role to ensure patients receive adequate notes and recordings.

摘要

背景

我们的乳腺癌诊所通过两种机制促进患者使用决策和沟通辅助工具(DAs/CAs):指导和提示。在2010年1月至9月期间,我们为1106名新访客中的462人(42%)提供了服务。在这462名访客中,267人(58%)接受了指导。对于其余的195人(42%),我们所能做的最好的事情就是提示他们自行使用决策和沟通辅助工具。

目的

我们想了解被提示使用DAs/CAs的患者是否这样做了。

方法

我们在患者就诊后对被提示使用工具的患者进行了调查。我们询问了他们查看了每种决策辅助工具的多少内容,是否列出了问题、做了笔记以及对咨询过程进行了录音。我们统计了频率,并使用逻辑回归探索了相关性。

结果

在195名被提示使用工具的患者中,82人回复了调查(42%)。几乎所有人(66/73,即90%)报告查看了部分或全部手册,52/73(71%)报告观看了部分或全部DVD。虽然63/78(81%)回复说他们写了问题清单,但只有14/61(23%)说他们将清单给医生看了。三分之二(51/77,即66%)说有人做了笔记,但只有16/79(20%)报告进行了录音。

讨论

更多患者报告遵循提示使用决策辅助工具而非沟通辅助工具。很少有人报告将问题清单给医生看或对就诊过程进行录音。我们的探索性分析揭示了使用沟通辅助工具与种族/民族或教育程度之间的相关性,值得进一步研究。

结论

提示患者能确保更好地使用决策辅助工具而非沟通辅助工具。临床医生可能需要发挥更积极的作用,以确保患者能得到充分的笔记和录音。

相似文献

9
Cancer patients' perspective on shared decision-making and decision aids in oncology.癌症患者对肿瘤学中共同决策和决策辅助的看法。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;147(6):1725-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03579-6. Epub 2021 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Implementing patient question-prompt lists into routine cancer care.将患者问题清单纳入常规癌症护理。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):252-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
7
Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer.癌症患者会诊记录或总结。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001539.pub2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验